Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
SS-2320/2009-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:SS0000000383 Generato dall'IA

Travel expenses for defense visits to a detained client are allowed if they match the standard for a defense lawyer in the Aarhus district.

Numero d'incarto SS-2320/2009-VLR
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's decision granting the defendant permission to travel for defense visits. The material facts show the defendant sought reimbursement for travel costs incurred while visiting a detained client, arguing these expenses should be covered. The court ruled that the expenses are valid only if they do not exceed the standard reimbursement rate applicable to a defense lawyer based in the Aarhus district.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 103, stk. 1, lit. b af Straffelovens § 163; Defense costs for travel to visit a detained client are reimbursable only if the amount does not exceed the standard rate for a defense lawyer operating in the relevant district.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
defense visit expenses travel reimbursement standards detained client visits Aarhus district rate criminal procedure costs rischio di soggiorno illegale regime speciale delle agenzie di viaggio rimborso delle spese di trasporto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 103, stk. 1, lit. b af Straffelovens § 163
Generato dall'IA
SS-3856/2009-ARH
Court dismisses lawyer's request to lift travel ban due to serious theft charge and lack of prior client relationship.
SS-1862/2008-OLR
Appeal dismissed; appointment of defense counsel with travel restriction upheld under Criminal Procedure Act.
SS-1657/2017-HJO
Defense lawyer's travel time fees dismissed as not covered by standard retainer agreement terms.
SS-2343/2009-OLR
High Court upholds travel ban for defense lawyer due to low case costs and travel expenses.
SS-28/2025-HJR
Supreme Court lifts travel ban for defense lawyer in serious sexual assault case due to prior client relationship.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Landsretten stadfæstede byrettens afgørelse om rejsebeforhold med den præcisering, at forsvareren vil kunne få dækket rejsetid og rejseudgifter i forbindelse med arrestbesøg, der ikke overstiger, hvad en forsvarer med kontor i Århus retskreds ville få godtgjort