Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
SS-2400/2008-ODE ECLI:DK:ODE:2024:SS0000000350 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses prosecution for assault on 11-year-old son and rejects compelled testimony request.

Numero d'incarto SS-2400/2008-ODE
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court dismissed the prosecution for assault against the defendant's 11-year-old son and rejected the request to compel the son's testimony under Section 171, Paragraph 3 of the Code of Judicial Procedure. The prosecution argued the assault occurred, while the defense contended the child's statement should not be forced. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the assault beyond reasonable doubt and that compelling a minor's testimony violated procedural protections.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Straffesagsloven § 171, stk. 3; Retsplejelovens § 171, stk. 3: The court may not compel a minor to give testimony in a criminal case without strict adherence to protective measures, and the prosecution bears the full burden of proving the alleged offense.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assault prosecution minor testimony compelled statement criminal procedure burden of proof child protection dismissal of charges età del minore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Straffesagsloven § 171, stk. 3
Retsplejelovens § 171, stk. 3
Generato dall'IA
SS-324/2024-BOR
Court refuses to compel sister to testify against brother in sexual assault case due to family ties and mental health risks.
SS-1023/2025-QEQ
Guilty verdict for child abuse under Criminal Law § 88 despite defendant's denial of violence.
SS-3589/2023-OLR
Defendant convicted of rape by intercourse with own child under 15; appeal dismissed due to consistent witness testimony.
SS-80/2021-HJR
Supreme Court allows video testimony of abused child despite witness privilege claim due to public interest.
SS-1719/2008-OLR
Court rejects prosecution request for video interrogation without father's knowledge under Criminal Procedure Act.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Tiltale for vold mod 11-årig søn, og om det kan pålægges forurettede søn at afgive forklaring efter retsplejelovens § 171, stk 3