Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-2091/2009-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2023:BS0000006219 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses appeal for low-value case lacking Process Permission Board approval under Section 389.

Numero d'incarto BS-2091/2009-VLR
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of Justice dismissed the appeal because the lower court set costs below the 10,000 kr. threshold, requiring Process Permission Board approval which was absent. The appellant argued for review of the cost assessment, but the court noted that appeals for such low amounts are procedurally barred without specific permission. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as inadmissible due to the missing statutory authorization.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 389, paragraph 2 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; Section 389, paragraph 2 of the Rules of Civil Procedure: Appeals against judgments setting costs below 10,000 kr. require explicit permission from the Process Permission Board, and without such permission, the appeal is inadmissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
costs below threshold Process Permission Board admissibility requirement civil procedure rules low value appeal spese di procedura soglia del valore litigioso opposizione al precetto esecutivo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 389, paragraph 2 of the Rules of Civil Procedure
retsplejelovens § 389, st.
Generato dall'IA
BS-7042/2024-VLR
Appeal dismissed because leave from the Procedure Permission Board was required under the Rules of Civil Procedure but not obtained.
BS-557/2011-OLR
Appeal against refusal to accept late complaint under tax law section 64 is dismissed as inadmissible.
BS-397/2011-OLR
Appeal court upholds lower court's decision to reopen a small claims case after default judgment. The court confirms the general right to request case reopening under the Code of Civil Procedure. The decision clarifies that small claims rules do not exclude the general reopening provision. The court notes the defendant requested reopening within the statutory time limit. The appeal court affirms the lower court's ruling on reopening the proceedings.
BS-701/2011-OLR
Court upholds lower court ruling allowing name change after corporate merger under company law provisions.
BS-33238/2024-HJR
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for 6,000 DKK costs ruling without Process Permission Board approval under Section 584a.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Landsretten afviser kæremål, da byretten ved afgørelsen af sag har fastsat sagsomkostninger til et beløb, der ikke overstiger 10.000 kr., og afgørelsen derfor kun kan kæres med tilladelse fra Procesbevillingsnævnet, jf. retsplejelovens § 389, st. 2., og sådan tilladelse foreligger ikke