Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-1751/2010-HJO ECLI:DK:HJO:2023:BS0000003661 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses request to postpone civil case due to lack of valid grounds for delay.

Numero d'incarto BS-1751/2010-HJO
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court rejected the defendant's request to postpone the civil proceedings regarding wheelchairs on the property. While the defendant argued that determining the wheelchair placement required time, the plaintiff contested this without providing a valid reason. The court found no legal basis for the delay and ordered the case to proceed to judgment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Civil Procedure Act; Court Procedure Act: A party must demonstrate valid grounds to postpone proceedings; mere uncertainty about factual details does not constitute sufficient justification for a delay.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
postponement request valid grounds required civil procedure rules property dispute procedural delay ritiro della domanda domanda tardiva di ricusazione legittimazione a contestare licenza
Generato dall'IA
BS-590/2011-HEL
Court dismisses appeal against Nature Board decision due to missed six-month statutory filing deadline.
SS-2732/2016-OLR
Court declares deportation and reporting obligations invalid due to disproportionate interference with freedom of movement.
SS-579/2011-OLR
Defendant acquitted of trademark infringement for lack of aggravating circumstances despite intentional violation.
SS-3283/2006-VLR
Appeal dismissed because defendant failed to appear without valid reason, preventing fair trial proceedings.
BS-2296/2008-HIL
Court dismisses appeal as parties agree to revoke fence committee's decision without opposition.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Beslutning om, hvorvidt sagen kan udsættes eller ej

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) RETTEN I HJORRING

Den l(r. novcmbcr 201 I kl. 09:00 blev rettcn sat af Dommer 1 .

Der blcv firretaget i offentligt retsmode sag nr. BS l-1751,12010:

Sagsøger Adresse 1 By 1 mod Sagsøgte Adresse 2 8400 Ebeltoft

For sagsogeren modte, advokat Mogens Pahl Christensen.

For sagsogte modte, advokat Per Mogensen.

Sagsoger fremlagde:

- Stevning.

- Replik.

- Bilag 1-9.

- Bilag 10.

Sagsogte fremlagde:

- Svarskrift.

- Bilag A

Endvidere fremlagdes fortegnelser.

Sagsogeren, afgav behori gt formanet forklaring

Sagsogte, afgav behorigt formanet forklaring

Vidne 1 , Adresse 3 , By 2 , afgav behorigt formanet forklaring.

Advokat Pcr Mogensor.r arulodcdc om, at sagen udsrttss rned henblik pi, at det kan blive fastlagt, hvorledes hjulsporene er placeret pi grunden.

Advokat Mogens Pahl Christensen protesterede imod det, idet han ikke tandt nogen gn"rndlag for at udsatte sagen.

Retten fandt intet gnrndlag for at udsette sagen

Advokat Per Mogensen tilkendegav, at han karer rettens beslutning.

Sagen procederedes og optoges til dom, der afsiges onsdag den 30. novem- Side 2/2

ber20ll kl. 10.00

Retten hevet

Dommer 1