Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
SS-2440/2025-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2026:SS0000000133 Generato dall'IA

Seizure of car deemed disproportionate; confiscation order upheld despite claim of unproportionate interference.

Numero d'incarto SS-2440/2025-KBH
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court upheld the seizure order, rejecting the applicant's claim that confiscating the vehicle constituted disproportionate interference. The applicant argued the measure was excessive, but the court found no evidence that the seizure was unproportionate given the circumstances. Consequently, the decision to maintain the seizure was confirmed as legally sound.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Straffelovens § 76; Straffelovens § 77: The seizure of a vehicle is not considered disproportionate interference if the circumstances justify the measure and the applicant fails to prove otherwise.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
disproportionate interference seizure of vehicle confiscation order criminal procedure proportionality principle contravvenzione per eccesso di velocità sorpasso pericoloso reato di pirateria della strada

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Straffelovens § 76
Straffelovens § 77
Generato dall'IA
SS-1970/2021-VLR
Court upholds police seizure of car where leaseholder faces significant financial risk from tenant's inability to pay.
SS-1157/2021-SVEef
Court allows police seizure of car where owner could not foresee son's illegal street racing.
SS-1702/2021-OLR
Confiscation of third-party vehicle upheld where owner could not foresee its use for racing.
SS-598/2013-HIL
Court orders confiscation of car despite defendant's financial hardship and need for transport.
SS-1365/2013-ALB
Court approves police seizure of truck as suspect is sole owner and previously convicted of driving while suspended.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sag om, hvorvidt beslaglæggelse af bil skal ophæves, fordi det må antages at være uforholdsmæssigt indgribende at konfiskere bilen

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.