Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 13/13, 2 B 13/13 (2 C 10/14) Generato dall'IA

Damages for unlawful failure to promote: treatment of budgetary line-item notes in hypothetical causality

Numero d'incarto 2 B 13/13, 2 B 13/13 (2 C 10/14)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (2nd Senate) granted the plaintiff's complaint and allowed the appeal on points of law (Revision), determining that the legal question presented possesses fundamental significance. The dispute concerns a claim for damages due to the unlawful failure to promote a civil servant, specifically challenging whether and how to account for potentially unlawful budgetary line-item notes (Stellenvermerks) that link certain retention periods to the deployment of aggregated staff positions when establishing the hypothetical causal chain of events. The decision is based on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits admission of appeal where a legal question of general importance requires clarification by the highest administrative court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 13 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Damages for unlawful failure to promote: treatment of budgetary line-item notes in hypothetical causality: The dispute concerns a claim for damages due to the unlawful failure to promote a civil servant, specifically challenging whether and how to account for potentially unlawful budgetary line-item notes (Stellenvermerks) that link certain retention periods to the deployment of aggregated staff positions when establishing the hypothetical causal chain of events. The decision is based on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits admission of appeal where a legal question of general importance requires clarification by the highest administrative court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
disposizioni sulla promozione reclamo amministrativo causa civile motivi di revisione nesso causale accantonamento per rischi e perdite

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The provision cited as the main ground for allowing the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m.
§ 13 GKG
September 2002 - BVerwG 2 B 23.02 - Buchholz 360 § 13 GKG Nr.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
The provision cited for the provisional determination of the subject matter value for the revision procedure.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 15/13, 2 B 15/13 (2 C 12/14)
Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion and the consideration of budgetary position notes linking deployment to retention periods
2 B 14/13, 2 B 14/13 (2 C 11/14)
Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion: accounting for budget place-of-service note dwell-time restrictions in bundle position allocation
2 C 10/14
Damages for delayed police promotion: causality despite unlawful tenure-based selection restriction under Article 33(2) Basic Law and budgetary position limits
2 C 12/14
Damages for delayed civil servant promotion contingent on hypothetical promotion chance under budgetary constraints
2 B 63/14
Employee damages for failed promotion: Incompatibility of unverified official assurance with adequate causation doctrine

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The provision cited as the main ground for allowing the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m. § 40, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F.

The procedural provisions applied to determine the subject matter value for the complaint procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

The provision cited for the provisional determination of the subject matter value for the revision procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Schadensersatz wegen unterlassener Beförderung; Berücksichtigung eines Stellenvermerks des Haushaltsplans; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob und ggf. wie bei einer Klage auf Schadensersatz wegen rechtswidrig unterlassener Beförderung im Rahmen der Ermittlung des hypothetischen Kausalverlaufs die - möglicherweise rechtswidrigen, weil an bestimmte Verweilzeiten anknüpfenden - Vorgaben eines Stellenvermerks des Haushaltsplans bei der Ausbringung gebündelter Stellen zu berücksichtigen sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m. § 40, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F. (Beschluss vom 26. September 2002 - BVerwG 2 B 23.02 - Buchholz 360 § 13 GKG Nr. 114 S. 10); die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.