Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 58/13, 2 B 58/13 (2 C 6/14) Generato dall'IA

Whether circumstances equating a service offense with a theft exclude the mitigation ground of the property's low value

Numero d'incarto 2 B 58/13, 2 B 58/13 (2 C 6/14)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for basic significance, allowing the case to proceed to the merits without determining the final substantive outcome. The dispute concerns a disciplinary proceeding against a civil servant for a service offense involving a theft-like access offense, specifically focusing on whether circumstances that justify equating a service offense with a theft offense simultaneously preclude the application of the mitigation factor for the low value of the property. The decision rests on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO and § 67 LDG NRW, addressing the legal question of whether the equivalence between a service offense and a theft offense excludes the recognized mitigation ground of property insignificance, a conflict identified in prior case law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW; Whether circumstances equating a service offense with a theft exclude the mitigation ground of the property's low value: The dispute concerns a disciplinary proceeding against a civil servant for a service offense involving a theft-like access offense, specifically focusing on whether circumstances that justify equating a service offense with a theft offense simultaneously preclude the application of the mitigation factor for the low value of the property. The decision rests on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO and § 67 LDG NRW, addressing the legal question of whether the equivalence between a service offense and a theft offense excludes the recognized mitigation ground of property insignificance, a conflict identified in prior case law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
accesso al fondo valore litigioso imputazione di furto casi di esclusione abuso di diritto circostanza attenuante

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Provision cited as the basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.
§ 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW
Provision cited in conjunction with the federal procedural rule to authorize the admission of the appeal in this specific disciplinary matter.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerwGE 116, 308
Juni 2002 - BVerwG 1 D 31.01 - BVerwGE 116, 308 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 StR 218/24
Lack of special public interest affirmation as procedural obstacle in prosecution for theft of low-value items
5 StR 293/25
Qualification of residential burglary in the operative part and application of the minor-value exception to aggravated theft in the sentencing assessment
V ZB 19/12
Scope of property servitude and valuation of appeal object based on incremental property value diminution
5 StR 485/25
Confiscation of stolen goods' value precluded by prior restitution; exclusion of cross-case offsetting due to per-case aggravation ban
3 StR 468/22
Dismissal of low-value theft conviction without special public interest and setting of missing fine day-rates

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provision cited as the basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.

§ 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW

Provision cited in conjunction with the federal procedural rule to authorize the admission of the appeal in this specific disciplinary matter.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Dienstvergehen; Zugriffsdelikt; Milderungsgrund der Geringwertigkeit der Sache; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zugelassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW). Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet zur Klärung der Frage beizutragen, ob Umstände, die die Gleichstellung eines Dienstvergehens mit einem Zugriffsdelikt rechtfertigen, zugleich dazu herangezogen werden können, den in der Rechtsprechung anerkannten Milderungsgrund der Geringwertigkeit der Sache auszuschließen (vgl. Urteil vom 11. Juni 2002 - BVerwG 1 D 31.01 - BVerwGE 116, 308 ).