Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 74/12, 2 B 74/12 (2 C 50/13) Generato dall'IA

Admission of revision for disciplinary sanction assessment of extramural criminal conduct by police officer

Numero d'incarto 2 B 74/12, 2 B 74/12 (2 C 50/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the admission of the defendant's revision, thereby ruling in favor of the respondent by finding the case suitable for further appellate review; the lower court's judgment remains in force pending the substantive revision proceeding. The dispute concerns the calibration of disciplinary measures for a police officer who committed a criminal offense outside of official duties, with the specific challenge focusing on how such extramural misconduct is weighted within the disciplinary sanction catalog. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO and § 70 SächsDG, under which the court established that the case possesses fundamental significance for clarifying the legal assessment of the severity and relevance of a police officer's extracurial criminal behavior in disciplinary proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Admission of revision for disciplinary sanction assessment of extramural criminal conduct by police officer: Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 70 SächsDG hat. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur weiteren Klärung der Einordnung außerdienstlichen strafbaren Fehlverhaltens nach seiner Schwere in den Disziplinarmaßnahmekatalog beizutragen. Insbesondere kann geklärt werden, welche Bedeutung dem Umstand beizumessen ist, dass sich ein Polizeibeamter außerdienstlich strafbar gemacht hat.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura di revisione penale condotta illecita della polizia regime disciplinare sanzione amministrativa impugnazione di decisioni amministrative fissazione della multa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 70 SächsDG hat.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 21/16
Police officer's removal for inner-service fraud: admissibility of revision based on unresolved disciplinary sentencing questions
2 B 39.25
Disciplinary dismissal of police officer for on-duty assault and evidentiary limits of criminal penalty order findings in civil service proceedings
2 B 25/24
Police officer's demotion for off-duty embezzlement: scope of discretionary mitigation and procedural admissibility of revision
2 C 38/10
Assessment of disciplinary measure for theft: aggregation of non-canonical mitigating circumstances to offset dismissal
2 B 6/19
Admissibility requirements for disciplinary revision and non-prejudicial effect of criminal sentencing on internal service offenses

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Maßnahmebemessung; außerdienstliches strafbares Fehlverhalten; Polizeibeamter; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 70 SächsDG hat. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur weiteren Klärung der Einordnung außerdienstlichen strafbaren Fehlverhaltens nach seiner Schwere in den Disziplinarmaßnahmekatalog beizutragen. Insbesondere kann geklärt werden, welche Bedeutung dem Umstand beizumessen ist, dass sich ein Polizeibeamter außerdienstlich strafbar gemacht hat.