Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
6 B 20/13, 6 B 20/13 (6 C 39/13) Generato dall'IA

Transfer of licensed telecommunications public way rights to successor entity in statutory merger

Numero d'incarto 6 B 20/13, 6 B 20/13 (6 C 39/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (6th Senate) granted the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of revision, declaring the appeal admissible on grounds of fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the full appellate court for a substantive ruling on whether telecommunications way rights granted via licensing transfer to a successor entity in a statutory merger. The dispute concerned the succession of public path usage rights established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 during a corporate merger, challenging the lower court's refusal to review the specific legal question of right transferability in such reorganizations. The decision hinged on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), which permits admission of revision when a case can clarify a general legal question not yet decided by the Federal Administrative Court, specifically regarding the interplay between licensing conditions under Sections 6, 8, and 50 of the Telecommunications Act and the continuity of administrative rights upon the dissolution and transfer of assets.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG; Transfer of licensed telecommunications public way rights to successor entity in statutory merger: The dispute concerned the succession of public path usage rights established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 during a corporate merger, challenging the lower court's refusal to review the specific legal question of right transferability in such reorganizations. The decision hinged on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), which permits admission of revision when a case can clarify a general legal question not yet decided by the Federal Administrative Court, specifically regarding the interplay between licensing conditions under Sections 6, 8, and 50 of the Telecommunications Act and the continuity of administrative rights upon the dissolution and transfer of assets.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
trasferimento di patrimonio diritto legale persona giuridica vertenza non amministrativa diritto di passo fusione di corporazioni di diritto pubblico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for admitting the revision based on the fundamental legal significance of the dispute regarding the transfer of telecommunication way rights in a merger.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for both the complaint and the revision procedure.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint procedure.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for admitting the revision based on the fundamental legal significance of the dispute regarding the transfer of telecommunication way rights in a merger.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint procedure.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for both the complaint and the revision procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; telekommunikationsrechtliches Wegerecht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob ein Recht zur Benutzung öffentlicher Wege, das im Rahmen der Erteilung einer Lizenz nach § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 Buchst. c, § 8 Abs. 1 bis 3, § 50 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Telekommunikationsgesetzes vom 25. Juli 1996 (BGBl I S. 1120) übertragen worden ist, im Fall einer Verschmelzung auf den übernehmenden Rechtsträger übergeht.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.