Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9 B 34/13, 9 B 34/13 (9 C 11/13) Generato dall'IA

Inclusion of non-qualifying residential plots in agricultural land reordering proceedings under §§ 53, 64 LwAnpG

Numero d'incarto 9 B 34/13, 9 B 34/13 (9 C 11/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) allowed an appeal (Revision) and dismissed the plaintiff's challenge, thereby prevailing for the defendant on procedural grounds. The dispute concerned the inclusion of residential plots (Hausgrundstücke) that did not independently meet the statutory requirements for land reorganization in an agricultural land ordering procedure (Bodenordnungsverfahren). The decisive legal issue was a conflict between the lower court's ruling—which held that such plots could not be included without a specific interest in reorganization under § 53 Abs. 1 LwAnpG—and the established legal principle that plots failing to satisfy the conditions of § 64 LwAnpG may still be included if their exclusion would prevent a sensible resolution of the underlying property conflict, particularly regarding infrastructure development. The court ordered that the case proceed to revision to resolve this divergence in case law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Inclusion of non-qualifying residential plots in agricultural land reordering proceedings under §§ 53, 64 LwAnpG: The dispute concerned the inclusion of residential plots (Hausgrundstücke) that did not independently meet the statutory requirements for land reorganization in an agricultural land ordering procedure (Bodenordnungsverfahren). The decisive legal issue was a conflict between the lower court's ruling—which held that such plots could not be included without a specific interest in reorganization under § 53 Abs. 1 LwAnpG—and the established legal principle that plots failing to satisfy the conditions of § 64 LwAnpG may still be included if their exclusion would prevent a sensible resolution of the underlying property conflict, particularly regarding infrastructure development. The court ordered that the case proceed to revision to resolve this divergence in case law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto fondiario fondo agricolo motivo legale d'esclusione vertenza non amministrativa decisioni incidentali motivi di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to a divergence from established case law.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited in the dispositive for the regulation of court costs.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for determining the amount in dispute.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited in the dispositive in conjunction with § 47 GKG for the cost and value determination.
Generato dall'IA
9 B 88/09
Land readjustment: modification of farm and building plots under § 45 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 1 FlurbG to align legal boundaries with actual possession
V ZB 1/12
Partial farm affiliation of multi-parcel estates and the scope of Agricultural Court authority to order deletion of non-farm plots from a registered farm.
4 B 31/10
Prägewirkung of former agricultural holdings and hobby animal husbandry on the classification of a mixed zone as a general residential area under § 4 BauNVO.
4 BN 2/10
Zoning of private plots as permanent allotment gardens: proportionality of property burden and equality in planning assessment
9 B 67/13
Land consolidation obligations to consider unexpressed farm expansion needs and valuation of consolidation-induced value changes

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to a divergence from established case law.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for determining the amount in dispute.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited in the dispositive in conjunction with § 47 GKG for the cost and value determination.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited in the dispositive for the regulation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Einbeziehung von Grundstücken in Bodenordnungsverfahren

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO zuzulassen. Das angefochtene Urteil stellt den Rechtssatz auf, dass Hausgrundstücke, die für sich nicht die Voraussetzungen des § 64 LwAnpG erfüllen, wegen fehlenden Interesses an einer Neuordnung i.S.d. § 53 Abs. 1 LwAnpG grundsätzlich nicht in ein Bodenordnungsverfahren einbezogen werden können. Damit weicht das angefochtene Urteil von dem entscheidungstragenden Rechtssatz im Urteil des erkennenden Senats vom 29. Juli 2002 - BVerwG 9 C 1.02 - Buchholz 424.02 § 64 LwAnpG Nr. 9 S. 8) ab, wonach in das Verfahrensgebiet für ein Bodenordnungsverfahren auch solche Grundstücke einbezogen werden können, die zwar für sich die Voraussetzungen des § 64 LwAnpG nicht erfüllen, ohne die aber - etwa unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Erschließung - eine sinnvolle Lösung des zugrunde liegenden sachenrechtlichen Konflikts nicht zu erreichen wäre.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.