Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 B 40/13, 5 B 40/13 (5 C 40/13) Generato dall'IA

Invalidity of health allowance limitation for basic tariff insured civil servants due to lack of statutory authorization

Numero d'incarto 5 B 40/13, 5 B 40/13 (5 C 40/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision, ruling in favor of the plaintiff (civil servant) and finding his complaint well-founded. The dispute centered on the validity of a regulation in the Federal Allowance Ordinance that restricted health allowance payments for civil servants with private "basic tariff" insurance to the flat rates agreed upon under § 75(3b) of the Fifth Book of the Social Code (SGB V). The court determined that the appeal raised a question of fundamental significance requiring clarification on whether this restriction is legally ineffective due to a lack of sufficient statutory authorization, violating the legal reservation principle. The key legal basis for the admission is § 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), citing the need to assess the validity of § 6(5) Sentence 1 of the Federal Allowance Ordinance against constitutional requirements.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Invalidity of health allowance limitation for basic tariff insured civil servants due to lack of statutory authorization: Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicurazione di base statuto dei funzionari vertenza di assicurazione sociale incostituzionalità assicurazione invalidità lite in materia di tariffa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.
Generato dall'IA
5 C 1/12
Civil servant benefits: invalidity of total benefit exclusion for lack of health insurance due to insufficient statutory authorization
5 C 16/13
Unconstitutionality of Basistarif clause in Beihilfe ordinance restricting allowances for involuntarily insured civil servants under Art. 3 Abs. 1 GG
1 BvR 1120/17
Adequacy of private health insurance basic tariff and mandatory statutory coverage for formerly privately insured persons
B 12 KR 20/18 R
Mandatory health insurance continuation for civil servants: Beihilfe alone insufficient to prove alternative coverage
5 C 5/22
Insufficiency of statutory authorization for salary-group-dependent health benefit reductions under the reservation of law

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Beihilfebeschränkung für im Basistarif privat versicherte Beamte; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob die Regelung des § 6 Abs. 5 Satz 1 Bundesbeihilfeverordnung, wonach im sog. Basistarif Versicherten Beihilfe nur nach Maßgabe der in den Verträgen nach § 75 Abs. 3b Satz 1 des Fünften Buches Sozialgesetzbuch vereinbarten Gebührenregelungen zu gewähren ist, im Hinblick auf den Grundsatz vom Vorbehalt des Gesetzes mangels hinreichender gesetzlicher Ermächtigung unwirksam ist.