Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 17/13, 6 B 17/13 (6 C 11/13) Generato dall'IA

Parental claim to mandatory non-denominational ethics education under Basic Law

Numero d'incarto 6 B 17/13, 6 B 17/13 (6 C 11/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's appeal against the non-admission of revision, granting leave to appeal and remitting the case for further proceedings, while the plaintiff prevailed at this procedural stage. The dispute concerns a claim by parents for the introduction of non-denominational ethics education in schools, challenging the lower court's decision to refuse admission of revision. The court found the matter to be of fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, necessitating clarification on whether such an entitlement arises from fundamental rights provisions of the Basic Law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Parental claim to mandatory non-denominational ethics education under Basic Law: The dispute concerns a claim by parents for the introduction of non-denominational ethics education in schools, challenging the lower court's decision to refuse admission of revision. The court found the matter to be of fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, necessitating clarification on whether such an entitlement arises from fundamental rights provisions of the Basic Law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conflitto genitoriale diritto alla formazione diritti fondamentali motivi di revisione congedo parentale diritti procedurali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal because the case has fundamental legal significance.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Basis for determining the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for determining the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
6 C 11/13
State obligation to establish a non-denominational Ethics subject in primary schools as a substitute for Religious Education; constitutional limits of parental education rights and equality under Art. 6(2), Art. 7(3), and Art. 3(3) GG
6 B 9/12, 6 B 9/12 (6 C 12/12)
Exemption from school attendance for religious reasons under parental education rights and freedom of religion
6 B 66/16
Denial of admission to public denominational school for non-affiliated minor without parental consent to religious instruction
1 BvR 984/17
Exclusion of non-denominational student from state confession school: conflict between parental religious freedom and the constitutional status of public Bekenntnisschulen under Art. 7(5) GG.
1 BvR 1555/14
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for lack of substantiation regarding failure to establish mandatory school ethics course

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal because the case has fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Basis for determining the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for determining the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Anspruch auf Einführung von Ethikunterricht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob bzw. inwieweit aus grundgesetzlichen Bestimmungen Ansprüche von Eltern auf Einführung nicht konfessionellen Ethikunterrichts erwachsen können.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.