Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 B 58/12, 5 B 58/12 (5 C 26/13) Generato dall'IA

Civil Service Medical Aid: Eligibility of Hospital Choice Services under § 17 KHEntgG

Numero d'incarto 5 B 58/12, 5 B 58/12 (5 C 26/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted an appeal on points of law filed by the defendant, overturning the lower court’s refusal to do so, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the full bench for a final decision on its merits. The dispute concerns a challenge to the denial of civil service medical aid (Beihilfe) for "choice services" (Wahlleistungen) incurred during hospital treatment. The court determined that the legal question of how § 17 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Halbs. 2 KHEntgG applies to the eligibility of costs for choice services qualifies as a matter of fundamental importance, satisfying the statutory requirement for the admission of the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Civil Service Medical Aid: Eligibility of Hospital Choice Services under § 17 KHEntgG: The dispute concerns a challenge to the denial of civil service medical aid (Beihilfe) for "choice services" (Wahlleistungen) incurred during hospital treatment. The court determined that the legal question of how § 17 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Halbs. 2 KHEntgG applies to the eligibility of costs for choice services qualifies as a matter of fundamental importance, satisfying the statutory requirement for the admission of the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisioni in materia medica impugnazione di decisioni amministrative gratuito patrocinio funzione pubblica oggetto della lite requisito legale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the procedural basis for the main ground of the verdict, justifying the admission of the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental importance of the legal question.
Generato dall'IA
5 B 2/23
Exclusion of befristeter Beihilfe für Verwandtenbehandlungen: statutory authorization sufficiency and fundamental rights under German civil servant medical benefit law
2 C 78/08
Beihilfe zu Zweibettzimmer-Kosten in Privatklinik: Keine Begrenzung auf Vergleichskrankenhaus-Entgelte bei Wahlleistungen
5 C 2/14
Subsidy eligibility of contract physician fees in private hospitals: distinction between choice services and general medical expenses under German subsidy regulations
3 C 16/12
Hospital Funding: Exclusion of Additional Service Deductions from Mandatory Administrative Approval Under KHEntgG
2 B 48/10, 2 B 48/10 (2 C 80/10)
Scope of "personal" services exclusion in German civil servant health benefits when treatment is performed by an employee of a relative's practice

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the procedural basis for the main ground of the verdict, justifying the admission of the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental importance of the legal question.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Beihilfe; Wahlleistung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, Fragen der Auslegung des § 17 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Halbs. 2 KHEntgG im Hinblick auf die Beihilfefähigkeit von Aufwendungen für Wahlleistungen zu klären.