Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 53/12, 6 B 53/12 (6 C 10/13) Generato dall'IA

Dependency of final telecommunications fee authorization on prior consultation and consolidation proceedings

Numero d'incarto 6 B 53/12, 6 B 53/12 (6 C 10/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the plaintiff's appeal against the non-admission of revision, granting the plaintiff a path to judicial review on questions of fundamental significance. The dispute concerned a telecommunications fee approval procedure, specifically challenging whether the Federal Network Agency could condition the final grant of a fee authorization on the prior completion of consultation and consolidation proceedings. The court found that the case met the criteria for fundamental importance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, requiring clarification on the interplay between the final fee approval, the consultation processes under § 12 TKG, and the statutory deadline for provisional authorizations under the old Telecommunications Act. Consequently, the court ordered that the matter proceed to revision, setting the dispute value for both the appeal and subsequent revision stages based on the respective provisions of the Court Costs Act (GKG).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Dependency of final telecommunications fee authorization on prior consultation and consolidation proceedings: The dispute concerned a telecommunications fee approval procedure, specifically challenging whether the Federal Network Agency could condition the final grant of a fee authorization on the prior completion of consultation and consolidation proceedings. The court found that the case met the criteria for fundamental importance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, requiring clarification on the interplay between the final fee approval, the consultation processes under § 12 TKG, and the statutory deadline for provisional authorizations under the old Telecommunications Act. Consequently, the court ordered that the matter proceed to revision, setting the dispute value for both the appeal and subsequent revision stages based on the respective provisions of the Court Costs Act (GKG).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tassa amministrativa procedura di consultazione procedura d'approvazione revisione di una decisione oggetto della lite sindacato giurisdizionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Legal basis for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal questions.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the appeal proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
6 C 3/11
Conflict between overlapping telecom fee approvals and the requirement for formal revocation of prior authorization
6 B 11/19
Binding effect of final regulatory order on fee approval methods despite alleged illegality in telecommunications network interconnection fees
6 B 25/20
Admissibility of revision appeal against annulment of telecommunications fee approval: independent legal grounds and requirement to challenge each self-sustaining basis
6 B 9/19
Binding effect of a final but substantively defective telecommunications regulatory order on subsequent fee approval methodology
6 B 5/15, 6 B 5/15 (6 C 24/15)
Telecommunications tariff authorization: contractual prerequisite for private-law effects under § 37(2) TKG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Legal basis for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal questions.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the appeal proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Entgeltgenehmigung; Konsultationsverfahren; Konsolidierungsverfahren

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Fragen beitragen, ob die Bundesnetzagentur berechtigt ist, die endgültige Entscheidung über die Erteilung einer Entgeltgenehmigung von der vorherigen Durchführung eines Konsultations- und Konsolidierungsverfahrens (§ 12 TKG) abhängig zu machen und ob der Erlass einer vorläufigen Entgeltgenehmigung zur Wahrung der Entscheidungsfrist des § 31 Abs. 6 Satz 3 des Telekommunikationsgesetzes in der bis zum Inkrafttreten des Gesetzes vom 3. Mai 2012 (BGBl I S. 958) geltenden Fassung (TKG a.F.) ausreicht.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.