Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 B 47/12, 2 B 47/12 (2 C 22/13) Generato dall'IA

Effect of mandatory occupational integration management on civil service retirement eligibility

Numero d'incarto 2 B 47/12, 2 B 47/12 (2 C 22/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the plaintiff's complaint and admitted a revision to the Federal Court of Justice, effectively prevailing for the plaintiff at the procedural level by allowing the case to proceed for a decision on its merits. The dispute concerns a civil servant's retirement due to unfitness for service, specifically challenging whether the employer fulfilled its statutory obligation to initiate occupational integration management (BEM) before ordering retirement. The decisive legal basis involves the interplay between § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX (mandatory occupational integration management) and § 44 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BBG (civil service retirement), with the court identifying a question of fundamental importance regarding the weight of BEM procedures in retirement decisions under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Effect of mandatory occupational integration management on civil service retirement eligibility: The dispute concerns a civil servant's retirement due to unfitness for service, specifically challenging whether the employer fulfilled its statutory obligation to initiate occupational integration management (BEM) before ordering retirement. The decisive legal basis involves the interplay between § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX (mandatory occupational integration management) and § 44 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BBG (civil service retirement), with the court identifying a question of fundamental importance regarding the weight of BEM procedures in retirement decisions under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pensionamento funzione pubblica conformità amministrativa diritto delle obbligazioni inserimento professionale decisioni incidentali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal importance of the question regarding occupational integration management in retirement decisions.
§ 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX
Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Bedeutung dem betrieblichen Eingliederungsmanagement (BEM) gemäß § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX für die Zurruhesetzung eines Beamten gemäß § 44 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung in den Vorinstanzen (Hälfte des 13-fachen Betrages des Endgrundgehalts samt ruhegehaltsfähigen Zulagen).
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal importance of the question regarding occupational integration management in retirement decisions.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Dienstunfähigkeit; Versetzung in den Ruhestand; betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Bedeutung dem betrieblichen Eingliederungsmanagement (BEM) gemäß § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX für die Zurruhesetzung eines Beamten gemäß § 44 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BBG zukommt.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung in den Vorinstanzen (Hälfte des 13-fachen Betrages des Endgrundgehalts samt ruhegehaltsfähigen Zulagen).