Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
5 B 5/13, 5 B 5/13 (5 C 19/13) Generato dall'IA

Social welfare agency’s BAföG cost recovery: whether Section 46 requires a prior application

Numero d'incarto 5 B 5/13, 5 B 5/13 (5 C 19/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) dismissed the defendant's appeal for lack of prospects of success and granted the plaintiff's leave to appeal on grounds of fundamental legal importance, thereby upholding the lower instance decision in favor of the plaintiff. The dispute arose from a cost reimbursement claim brought by a social welfare agency against a Federal Office for Education and Scholarship, concerning the legal requirements for initiating such claims in the context of educational support. The pivotal legal issue identified for further review is whether a formal application is required under Section 46 of the Federal Education and Scholarship Promotion Act (BAföG) for a social welfare agency to demand reimbursement from the Federal Office for Education and Scholarship.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Social welfare agency’s BAföG cost recovery: whether Section 46 requires a prior application: Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rimborso delle spese requisiti di forma recupero dei costi aiuto finanziario congedo per motivi sociali motivo di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ausbildungsförderung; Erstattungsstreit

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die grundsätzliche Frage zu klären, ob in einem Erstattungsstreit eines Sozialhilfeträgers gegenüber einem Amt für Ausbildungsförderung ein Antragserfordernis im Sinne von § 46 BAföG besteht.