Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
6 B 23/12, 6 B 23/12 (6 C 2/13) Generato dall'IA

Prerequisites for dominant media power under § 26 RStV in employment disputes with broadcasters

Numero d'incarto 6 B 23/12, 6 B 23/12 (6 C 2/13)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for the petitioner, ordering that the case proceed to the Senate for a full review on the merits. The dispute concerned a regulatory decision involving a television broadcaster and the determination of whether it held dominant media power (vorherrschende Meinungsmacht) under German media law. The court based its decision on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, finding that the legal question of the precise prerequisites for establishing dominant media power under § 26 Abs. 1 RStV possesses fundamental significance and requires further clarification by the Senate.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Prerequisites for dominant media power under § 26 RStV in employment disputes with broadcasters: The dispute concerned a regulatory decision involving a television broadcaster and the determination of whether it held dominant media power (vorherrschende Meinungsmacht) under German media law. The court based its decision on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, finding that the legal question of the precise prerequisites for establishing dominant media power under § 26 Abs. 1 RStV possesses fundamental significance and requires further clarification by the Senate.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto dei mezzi di comunicazione potere di decisione diritto di diffondere motivo di revisione piena occupazione diritti sindacali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Serves as the main ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionserlaubnis) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue regarding dominant media power.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Serves as the main ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionserlaubnis) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue regarding dominant media power.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung; vorherrschende Meinungsmacht; Fernsehveranstalter

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist jedenfalls gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Voraussetzungen für die Annahme vorherrschender Meinungsmacht im Sinne von § 26 Abs. 1 RStV weiterer Klärung zuzuführen.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.