Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 B 47/11, 4 B 47/11 (4 C 15/12) Generato dall'IA

Impairment of monument protection interests by a rural-area project under § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB

Numero d'incarto 4 B 47/11, 4 B 47/11 (4 C 15/12)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal, finding the appellant's complaint well-founded and allowing the case to proceed to the appellate level. The dispute concerned a land-use planning matter involving a non-standard project in the rural area, specifically challenging whether such a project infringes upon public interests related to monument protection. The court determined that the revision proceedings are necessary to clarify the legal prerequisites under § 35 Abs. 2 and § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB, which govern the assessment of public interests and potential impairments of heritage protection for projects outside of zoned urban areas.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 35 Abs. 2 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Impairment of monument protection interests by a rural-area project under § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB: The dispute concerned a land-use planning matter involving a non-standard project in the rural area, specifically challenging whether such a project infringes upon public interests related to monument protection. The court determined that the revision proceedings are necessary to clarify the legal prerequisites under § 35 Abs. 2 and § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB, which govern the assessment of public interests and potential impairments of heritage protection for projects outside of zoned urban areas.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
zone rurali tutela dell'interesse pubblico conservazione dei monumenti urbanistica procedure connesse livello di protezione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the need to clarify a fundamental legal question regarding public interests in monument protection.
§ 35 Abs. 2 BauGB
1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, unter welchen Voraussetzungen ein sonstiges Vorhaben im Außenbereich (§ 35 Abs. 2 BauGB) öffentliche Belange des Denkmalschutzes beeinträchtigt (§ 35 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
4 C 15/12
Loss of heritage protection as a defense to demolition orders for unapproved rural construction measures
4 B 47/13
Wind turbine in rural zone: balancing monument protection under § 35(3) No. 5 BauGB against regional wind energy planning
4 BN 36/19
Standing to challenge a rural area ordinance: property owner status and balancing of private interests under § 35 Abs. 6 BauGB
4 B 22/21
Rural fringe construction: land-use plan designations do not override § 35 Abs. 3 BauGB public interests
4 B 28/17
Monument owner's standing to challenge environmental impairment: constitutional requirement for third-party protection in heritage law

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the need to clarify a fundamental legal question regarding public interests in monument protection.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Voraussetzungen für die Beeinträchtigung der öffentlichen Belange des Denkmalschutzes durch ein sonstiges Vorhaben im Außenbereich

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, unter welchen Voraussetzungen ein sonstiges Vorhaben im Außenbereich (§ 35 Abs. 2 BauGB) öffentliche Belange des Denkmalschutzes beeinträchtigt (§ 35 Abs. 3 Satz 1 Nr. 5 Alt. 4 BauGB).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.