Breaking through res judicata of an administrative enforcement judgment in refugee law via tortious interference

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the appeal for revision, granting the applicant relief on procedural grounds without deciding the substantive merits. The dispute concerns refugee law, specifically the challenge to a final administrative court judgment compelling an agency to act, which the appellant sought to overturn by invoking tortious interference. The court ordered that the case be heard by the Federal Administrative Court to resolve the legally significant question of whether and under what conditions the legal force of an administrative court enforcement judgment in refugee matters can be broken through by citing civil law provisions regarding intentional torts.