Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
5 B 33/12, 5 B 33/12 (5 C 25/12) Generato dall'IA

Local jurisdiction for youth welfare services: scope of corresponding application of § 86 Abs. 4 SGB VIII under § 86 Abs. 5 Satz 3 SGB VIII

Numero d'incarto 5 B 33/12, 5 B 33/12 (5 C 25/12)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the petitioner’s leave to appeal, ordering that the revision proceedings proceed due to the fundamental legal significance of the case. The dispute concerns the determination of local jurisdiction for youth welfare services, specifically challenging the application of jurisdictional rules in a juvenile aid proceeding. The decisive legal issue is the scope of the "corresponding application" mandated by § 86 Abs. 5 Satz 3 of the Social Code Book VIII (SGB VIII) to § 86 Abs. 4 SGB VIII, which the court identified as requiring clarification for uniform interpretation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 86 Abs. 5 Satz 3 SGB VIII, § 86 Abs. 4 SGB VIII; Local jurisdiction for youth welfare services: scope of corresponding application of § 86 Abs. 4 SGB VIII under § 86 Abs. 5 Satz 3 SGB VIII: The dispute concerns the determination of local jurisdiction for youth welfare services, specifically challenging the application of jurisdictional rules in a juvenile aid proceeding. The decisive legal issue is the scope of the "corresponding application" mandated by § 86 Abs. 5 Satz 3 of the Social Code Book VIII (SGB VIII) to § 86 Abs. 4 SGB VIII, which the court identified as requiring clarification for uniform interpretation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
determinazione della competenza gratuito patrocinio servizio sociale interpretazione della sentenza portata della legge del contratto domanda di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 86 Abs. 5 Satz 3 SGB VIII
Die Revision kann zur Klärung des Bedeutungsgehalts der in § 86 Abs. 5 Satz 3 SGB VIII angeordneten entsprechenden Anwendung des § 86 Abs.
§ 86 Abs. 4 SGB VIII
5 Satz 3 SGB VIII angeordneten entsprechenden Anwendung des § 86 Abs. 4 SGB VIII beitragen.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Jugendhilfeleistung; örtliche Zuständigkeit

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen vom 27. Februar 2012 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann zur Klärung des Bedeutungsgehalts der in § 86 Abs. 5 Satz 3 SGB VIII angeordneten entsprechenden Anwendung des § 86 Abs. 4 SGB VIII beitragen.