Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 20/12, 6 B 20/12, 6 PKH 5/12 (6 C 18/12) Generato dall'IA

Constitutional constraints on university core area examination passing rules under Article 12(1) Basic Law

Numero d'incarto 6 B 20/12, 6 B 20/12, 6 PKH 5/12 (6 C 18/12)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the plaintiff's revision and granted legal aid, ruling that the issue possesses fundamental significance under § 132(2)(1) VwGO. The dispute concerned the passing requirements for university core area examinations (Schwerpunktbereichsprüfungen) in the context of the First State Judicial Examination, specifically challenging the conformity of these examination rules with constitutional standards. The court identified the decisive legal basis as the fundamental rights guarantees of Article 12(1) of the German Basic Law, which impose specific constraints on examination regulations established under § 5(1) of the Act on the Structure of the German University System (DRiG).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, Art. 12 Abs. 1 GG, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 166 VwGO, § 121 Abs. 1 ZPO; Constitutional constraints on university core area examination passing rules under Article 12(1) Basic Law: The dispute concerned the passing requirements for university core area examinations (Schwerpunktbereichsprüfungen) in the context of the First State Judicial Examination, specifically challenging the conformity of these examination rules with constitutional standards. The court identified the decisive legal basis as the fundamental rights guarantees of Article 12(1) of the German Basic Law, which impose specific constraints on examination regulations established under § 5(1) of the Act on the Structure of the German University System (DRiG).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
regolamento d'esame requisito costituzionale diritti costituzionali specifici diritto processuale diritto acquisito gratuito patrocinio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
Art. 12 Abs. 1 GG
Sie gibt dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der grundrechtlichen Vorgaben aus Art. 12 Abs. 1 GG für prüfungsrechtliche Bestehensregeln in Bezug auf universitäre Schwerpunktbereichsprüfungen im Sinne von § 5 Abs.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 166 VwGO
Die Bewilligung der Prozesskostenhilfe sowie die Beiordnung des Rechtsanwalts beruhen auf § 166 VwGO i.V.m.
§ 121 Abs. 1 ZPO
1 Satz 1, § 121 Abs. 1 ZPO.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Basis for setting the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for setting the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
6 C 18/12
Invalidity of examination pass requirements: constitutional limits on non-compensable sub-exam failures in university law degree core-area examinations
1 BvR 2218/13
Limits of judicial congruence requirement between university and state examinations under academic freedom
6 B 32/15
Constitutional determinacy requirements for grade calculation methods in professional admission examinations under Article 12(1) GG
2 B 74/14
Constitutional validity of single-retake limit for partial vocational exams under the principle of proportionality and occupational freedom
6 PKH 7/13, 6 PKH 7/13 (6 B 48/13)
Admissibility of examination repeat due to delayed correction and limits on repetition opportunities in university examination regulations.

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Basis for setting the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for setting the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 166 VwGO i.V.m. § 114 Satz 1, § 119 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 121 Abs. 1 ZPO

Basis for granting legal aid and appointing counsel.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; universitäre Schwerpunktbereichsprüfung; Erste juristische Staatsprüfung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Sie gibt dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der grundrechtlichen Vorgaben aus Art. 12 Abs. 1 GG für prüfungsrechtliche Bestehensregeln in Bezug auf universitäre Schwerpunktbereichsprüfungen im Sinne von § 5 Abs. 1 DRiG.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Die Bewilligung der Prozesskostenhilfe sowie die Beiordnung des Rechtsanwalts beruhen auf § 166 VwGO i.V.m. § 114 Satz 1, § 119 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 121 Abs. 1 ZPO.