Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
10 B 9/12, 10 B 9/12 (10 C 17/12) Generato dall'IA

Deportation ban: Fundamental significance of danger to the public via custodial sentence under § 60 Abs. 8 AufenthG

Numero d'incarto 10 B 9/12, 10 B 9/12 (10 C 17/12)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of a revision appeal to the same court, finding the complainant's complaint admissible and well-founded. The dispute concerned the application of deportation bans under German residency law, specifically whether a final conviction to a total custodial sentence meets the threshold for declaring a danger to the public. The court determined that the case holds fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, allowing the Bundesverwaltungsgericht to further clarify the statutory requirements of § 60 Abs. 8 Satz 1 Alt. 2 AufenthG regarding convictions for at least three years of imprisonment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Deportation ban: Fundamental significance of danger to the public via custodial sentence under § 60 Abs. 8 AufenthG: The dispute concerned the application of deportation bans under German residency law, specifically whether a final conviction to a total custodial sentence meets the threshold for declaring a danger to the public. The court determined that the case holds fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, allowing the Bundesverwaltungsgericht to further clarify the statutory requirements of § 60 Abs. 8 Satz 1 Alt. 2 AufenthG regarding convictions for at least three years of imprisonment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
divieto di espulsione pena privativa della libertà pericolo per l'incolumità pubblica requisito legale restrizione di libertà carcerazione in diritto degli stranieri

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.
Generato dall'IA
10 B 26/09, 10 B 26/09 (10 C 19/10)
Standards for judicial conviction in constitutional interpretation of deportation protection exceptions under § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG
10 B 18/10, 10 B 18/10 (10 C 24/10)
Constitutionally compliant application of § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG deportation ban: standards for judicial fact-finding in cases of general dangers
XIII ZB 13/20
Custodial detention for deportation: sufficiency of a danger-prevention order to establish presumed flight risk under the Return Directive
10 C 13/12
Deportation ban for unaccompanied minors: equivalent protection under § 58 Abs. 1a AufenthG prevents circumvention of § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 3 AufenthG
1 C 10.25
Scope of domestic deportation ban under § 60 Abs. 5 AufenthG and exclusion of family ties as grounds for in-country protection

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Abschiebungsverbot; Verurteilung zu einer Gesamtfreiheitsstrafe; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben, die Voraussetzungen des § 60 Abs. 8 Satz 1 Alt. 2 AufenthG (Gefahr für die Allgemeinheit wegen rechtskräftiger Verurteilung zu einer Freiheitsstrafe von mindestens 3 Jahren) weiter zu klären.