Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
7 B 44/11, 7 B 44/11 (7 C 10/12) Generato dall'IA

Partial plan retention under § 75 Abs. 1a VwVfG following a defect in the balancing of interests

Numero d'incarto 7 B 44/11, 7 B 44/11 (7 C 10/12)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the appeal against the exclusion of revision, finding that the case possesses fundamental legal significance, and consequently remanded the matter to the Regional Administrative Court. The dispute centers on a planning approval decision (Planfeststellungsbeschluss), specifically challenging whether partial retention of a plan (Planerhaltung) is permissible following an identified defect in the balancing of interests (Abwägungsmangel). The decisive legal issue, which necessitates further judicial clarification, is the extent to which § 75 Abs. 1a Satz 2 of the German Administrative Procedure Act (VwVfG) enables the retention of a plan for only a portion of the proposed project.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Partial plan retention under § 75 Abs. 1a VwVfG following a defect in the balancing of interests: The dispute centers on a planning approval decision (Planfeststellungsbeschluss), specifically challenging whether partial retention of a plan (Planerhaltung) is permissible following an identified defect in the balancing of interests (Abwägungsmangel). The decisive legal issue, which necessitates further judicial clarification, is the extent to which § 75 Abs. 1a Satz 2 of the German Administrative Procedure Act (VwVfG) enables the retention of a plan for only a portion of the proposed project.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisione parziale procedura di pianificazione oggetto della lite diritto di ritenzione retrocessione di credito conflitto con un disegno o modello anteriore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for admitting the complaint against the non-admission of revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the issue.
Generato dall'IA
4 BN 21/17
Antragsbefugnis in der Normenkontrolle bei bauleitplanerischer Abwägung und Flächennutzung nach § 50 BImSchG
1 AZR 873/11
Compensation for deviation from interest balancing agreement limited to direct adverse effects of operational change, excluding non-binding planning intentions
4 CN 2/22
Antragsbefugnis in der Normenkontrolle: Keine Abwägungsrelevanz für bebaute Grundstücke im Regionalen Grünzug bei funktionaler, nicht flächenscharfer Zielfestlegung
XII ZB 533/22
Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand bei Fristversäumnis durch Prozessbevollmächtigte: Eigenverantwortliche Prüfung der Berufungsbegründungsfrist und Pflicht zur Eintragung einer ausreichenden Vorfrist
4 BN 34/11
Standing to challenge partial plan amendment affecting distribution mass within unified redistribution area

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the complaint against the non-admission of revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the issue.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Planfeststellungsbeschluss; Planerhaltung bei Abwägungsmangel

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie wirft voraussichtlich u.a. die klärungsbedürftige Frage auf, inwieweit § 75 Abs. 1a Satz 2 VwVfG die Planerhaltung für einen Teil des Vorhabens ermöglicht.