Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
8 B 96/11, 8 B 96/11 (8 C 9/12) Generato dall'IA

Recognition of Austrian Master Builder qualification: Definition of “Architect” under Art. 10(c) Directive 2005/36/EC

Numero d'incarto 8 B 96/11, 8 B 96/11 (8 C 9/12)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the appeal to the Federal Administrative Court, granting the plaintiff's legal remedy and finding that the case involves a question of fundamental significance. The dispute concerned the recognition of a professional qualification as a "Master Builder" (Baumeister) obtained in Austria for practice in Germany, which had been challenged by the defendant authority. The court determined that the appeal must be reviewed to clarify the specific requirements imposed by Article 10(c) of Directive 2005/36/EC regarding the occupational term "Architect," thereby establishing the legal basis for the substantive review in the revision proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG; Recognition of Austrian Master Builder qualification: Definition of “Architect” under Art. 10(c) Directive 2005/36/EC: The dispute concerned the recognition of a professional qualification as a "Master Builder" (Baumeister) obtained in Austria for practice in Germany, which had been challenged by the defendant authority. The court determined that the appeal must be reviewed to clarify the specific requirements imposed by Article 10(c) of Directive 2005/36/EC regarding the occupational term "Architect," thereby establishing the legal basis for the substantive review in the revision proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
direttiva qualifiche clausola d'architetto autorità amministrativa presupposti materiali professioni urbanistiche procedura di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for admitting the revision appeal due to the presence of a question of fundamental significance.
§ 52 Abs. 4 GKG
1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
10 C 5/15
Recognition of non-listed vocational qualification as architect under EU Directive 2005/36/EC: “special and extraordinary reasons” requirement and definition of architect profession
8 C 9/12
Interpretation of "specific and exceptional reasons" and professional qualifications for automatic recognition of an architect title under the Mutual Recognition Directive
I ZR 68/09
Use of regulated "Architect" title without local chamber registration: compatibility of national exclusivity requirement with EU freedom of establishment
2 C 9.25
Eligibility of architect-in-training periods as salaried experience for public service officers under the prohibition of prerequisite training
I ZR 172/08
Recognition of Austrian Master's Degree as Academic Title, Not Protected Specialist Designation, in Competition Law Context

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the revision appeal due to the presence of a question of fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Berufsanerkennung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von dem Beklagten geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu. Im Revisionsverfahren wird im Hinblick auf die vom Kläger in Österreich erworbene Qualifikation als Baumeister voraussichtlich zu klären sein, welche Anforderungen Art. 10 Buchst. c der Richtlinie 2005/36/EG mit dem Tatbestandsmerkmal "Architekt" stellt.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG.