Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9 B 70/11, 9 B 70/11 (9 C 2/12) Generato dall'IA

Municipal game tax as a cost tax: constitutional validity under Art. 105(2a) GG

Numero d'incarto 9 B 70/11, 9 B 70/11 (9 C 2/12)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court permitted the taxpayer's appeal and authorized the subsequent revision to the same court, ruling that the matter has fundamental legal significance. The case concerns a dispute over the validity of a municipal game tax (Jagdsteuer), where the plaintiff challenged the levy as a cost tax (Aufwandsteuer). The decisive legal issue is whether a municipality may impose a game tax as a cost tax under Article 105(2a) of the German Basic Law, a question the Supreme Court will now address to clarify the constitutional constraints on local tax competences.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Municipal game tax as a cost tax: constitutional validity under Art. 105(2a) GG: The case concerns a dispute over the validity of a municipal game tax (Jagdsteuer), where the plaintiff challenged the levy as a cost tax (Aufwandsteuer). The decisive legal issue is whether a municipality may impose a game tax as a cost tax under Article 105(2a) of the German Basic Law, a question the Supreme Court will now address to clarify the constitutional constraints on local tax competences.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
imposta locale costituzionalità autorità fiscale validità del testamento spese amministrative oggetto della lite

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for permitting the revision to the Federal Administrative Court due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
Generato dall'IA
9 C 2/12
Municipal exclusion from hunting tax liability under Art. 105(2a) GG due to absence of personal consumption expenditure
9 C 10/11
Jagdsteuerpflicht of Jagdgenossenschaften for non-leased communal hunting districts and applicability of expenditure tax to public-law corporations
9 B 5/11
Classification of hunting tax on a public-law corporation as an expenditure tax under Article 105(2a) Basic Law
9 BN 2/15
Constitutional validity of a municipal horse tax as a local expenditure tax under Art. 105 Abs. 2a GG
9 BN 2/18
Constitutional validity of entertainment tax on gaming revenue as local expenditure tax and compatibility with VAT Directive and freedom of services

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for permitting the revision to the Federal Administrative Court due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erhebung der Jagdsteuer

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob von einer Gemeinde eine Jagdsteuer als Aufwandsteuer i.S.d. Art. 105 Abs. 2a GG erhoben werden darf.