Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11) Generato dall'IA

Urban Planning Justification for Strengthening Central Service Areas: Requirements for Land-Use Plan Determinations

Numero d'incarto 4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted permission for appeal in a dispute concerning the urban planning justification for statutory land-use plan determinations aimed at strengthening central service areas. The complainant prevailed on the procedural motion, as the court found the underlying question to be of fundamental importance requiring clarification, thereby reversing the lower instance's refusal to allow the appeal. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates appellate jurisdiction when a legal issue of general significance requires resolution by the highest administrative court, specifically regarding the substantive requirements for the urban planning justification of measures designed to enhance central service zones.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Urban Planning Justification for Strengthening Central Service Areas: Requirements for Land-Use Plan Determinations: The complainant prevailed on the procedural motion, as the court found the underlying question to be of fundamental importance requiring clarification, thereby reversing the lower instance's refusal to allow the appeal. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates appellate jurisdiction when a legal issue of general significance requires resolution by the highest administrative court, specifically regarding the substantive requirements for the urban planning justification of measures designed to enhance central service zones.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
urbanistica zona urbana determinazione della competenza presupposti materiali utilizzazione del fondo base legale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.