Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
7 B 30/11, 7 B 30/11 (7 C 30/11) Generato dall'IA

Suitability of Construction Noise Ordinance intervention values for defining outdoor noise tolerance limits for commercial premises

Numero d'incarto 7 B 30/11, 7 B 30/11 (7 C 30/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the defendant's complaint, reversed the lower court's denial of appellate review, and authorized the defendant to file an appeal on the ground of fundamental legal significance. The dispute centers on whether specific noise intervention values from the Construction Noise Ordinance (AVV-Baulärm) are suitable for determining the threshold of unreasonableness (Zumutbarkeitsgrenze) for noise in the outdoor contact areas of retail premises, challenging a protection claim filed under administrative and environmental law. The court relied on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO to admit the appeal, identifying the unresolved question of applying these construction noise standards to commercial outdoor zones under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG in conjunction with § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG as a matter of fundamental legal significance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Suitability of Construction Noise Ordinance intervention values for defining outdoor noise tolerance limits for commercial premises: The dispute centers on whether specific noise intervention values from the Construction Noise Ordinance (AVV-Baulärm) are suitable for determining the threshold of unreasonableness (Zumutbarkeitsgrenze) for noise in the outdoor contact areas of retail premises, challenging a protection claim filed under administrative and environmental law. The court relied on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO to admit the appeal, identifying the unresolved question of applying these construction noise standards to commercial outdoor zones under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG in conjunction with § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG as a matter of fundamental legal significance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
zona di rumore norma ambientale zona commerciale motivo di revisione conformità alla licenza edilizia tutela legale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Provision cited to authorize the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding noise thresholds for commercial premises.
Generato dall'IA
7 B 29/11, 7 B 29/11 (7 C 29/11)
Admissibility of revision on whether AVV-Baulärm intervention values define the noise tolerance threshold for retail spaces under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG
7 A 24/11
Construction noise immission thresholds, traffic noise pre-exposure, and compensation limits under the Administrative Regulation on Construction Noise in plan approval proceedings
8 B 36/18
Noise immission tolerance in mixed land-use zones: applicability of intermediate value calculation (Zwischenwertbildung) for non-privileged external area businesses
7 A 12/11
Scope of construction noise compensation under the VwVfG: excluding economic loss from § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 3 and limiting liability to immissions exceeding the AVV Baulärm threshold.
4 BN 6/12
Eligibility of passive noise protection as a balancing measure for residential encroachment on commercial zones

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provision cited to authorize the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding noise thresholds for commercial premises.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren kann Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Eingriffswerte der AVV-Baulärm im Rahmen eines Schutzanspruchs aus § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG i.V.m. § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG geeignet sind, die Zumutbarkeitsgrenze für Lärm im Außenkontaktbereich von Ladengeschäften zu bestimmen.