Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 88/10, 2 B 88/10 (2 C 62/11) Generato dall'IA

Participation of equality officer in administrative disciplinary proceedings under § 19 Abs. 1 BGleiG

Numero d'incarto 2 B 88/10, 2 B 88/10 (2 C 62/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal to the defendant, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the Revisionsverhandlung stage. The dispute concerns the procedural requirements for the mandatory participation of an equality officer in an administrative disciplinary proceeding. The court determined that the issue possesses fundamental legal significance, necessitating a clarification of the specific preconditions under which an equality officer must be involved pursuant to § 19 Abs. 1 of the Federal Act on Equal Treatment (BGleiG) in disciplinary matters.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Participation of equality officer in administrative disciplinary proceedings under § 19 Abs. 1 BGleiG: Die Revision des Beklagten ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO und § 69 BDG zuzulassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren kann geklärt werden, unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Gleichstellungsbeauftragte in einem behördlichen Disziplinarverfahren nach § 19 Abs. 1 BGleiG zu beteiligen ist.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura disciplinare uguaglianza di trattamento partecipazione alla procedura presupposto processuale infrazione amministrativa ricorso del personale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision des Beklagten ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO und § 69 BDG zuzulassen.
Generato dall'IA
5 PB 16/16
Exclusion of equality officers from staff council elections: insufficient substantiation of fundamental significance for leave to appeal
5 A 2/21
Limitation of Equalities Officer's standing to challenge objection rejections under § 34 Abs. 2 No. 1 BGleiG
5 C 14/22
Exclusion of equality officer from employee selection process due to personal interest and constitutional impartiality principles
6 C 3/09
Right of gender equality officer to active participation in leadership conferences shaping personnel and organizational decision-making processes under § 20 Abs. 1 Satz 3 BGleiG
2 A 3/20
Involvement of equality officer in individual service assessments and procedural validity of early disclosure

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Beteiligung der Gleichstellungsbeauftragten im Disziplinarverfahren

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Beklagten ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO und § 69 BDG zuzulassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren kann geklärt werden, unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Gleichstellungsbeauftragte in einem behördlichen Disziplinarverfahren nach § 19 Abs. 1 BGleiG zu beteiligen ist.