Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
3 B 34/11, 3 B 34/11 (3 C 31/11) Generato dall'IA

Suspension of Medical License: Lapse of Statutory Prerequisites Upon Final Conclusion of Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto 3 B 34/11, 3 B 34/11 (3 C 31/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's complaint, finding that the lower court's judgment deviated from a prior binding precedent; consequently, the plaintiff prevailed in this admissibility decision for the subsequent revision. The dispute concerned the legality of an authority's order to suspend a medical license (approbation) following the final conclusion of a criminal proceeding. The decisive legal issue centered on § 6(1)(1) of the Federal Physicians Act, where the prior precedent established that the statutory prerequisites for suspension lapse upon the final closure of the criminal case, a principle the lower court had incorrectly rejected.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Suspension of Medical License: Lapse of Statutory Prerequisites Upon Final Conclusion of Criminal Proceedings: The dispute concerned the legality of an authority's order to suspend a medical license (approbation) following the final conclusion of a criminal proceeding. The decisive legal issue centered on § 6(1)(1) of the Federal Physicians Act, where the prior precedent established that the statutory prerequisites for suspension lapse upon the final closure of the criminal case, a principle the lower court had incorrectly rejected.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione di una decisione base legale reclamo amministrativo previo principio di legalità ritiro della concessione decisione pregiudiziale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Cited as the procedural basis for admitting the complaint due to a deviation from prior binding case law.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited to authorize the court's decision on the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited in conjunction with other norms to provide the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited to establish the legal framework for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.
Generato dall'IA
3 C 13/19
Suspension of medical license requires concrete danger during pending criminal proceedings, not just probable conviction
3 B 6/11
Revocation of Medical License for Criminal Conduct: Professional Linkage to Medical Practice and Evidentiary Weight of Final Criminal Judgments in Administrative Proceedings
3 B 36/12
Refusal of medical re-licensing: evidentiary standard for restoration of professional dignity and admissibility of revision
1 BvR 722/10
Suspension of immediate execution of medical license revocation: proportionality of general preventive interests versus irreparable professional harm under occupational freedom and effective judicial review.
1 BvR 1657/17
Revocation of medical license: sufficiency of statutory "unfitness" basis and proportionality of occupational freedom restriction

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Cited as the procedural basis for admitting the complaint due to a deviation from prior binding case law.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited in conjunction with other norms to provide the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited to establish the legal framework for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited to authorize the court's decision on the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Anordnung des Ruhens der Approbation

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs weicht im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO von dem Beschluss des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts vom 29. November 2007 - BVerwG 3 C 52.06 - ab. Während dem Beschluss des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts der Rechtssatz zugrunde liegt, dass die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für eine Anordnung des Ruhens der Approbation nach § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 der Bundesärzteordnung - BÄO - entfallen, wenn das Strafverfahren rechtskräftig abgeschlossen ist, beruht das angegriffene Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs auf dessen Rechtsauffassung, dass der rechtskräftige Abschluss des Strafverfahrens der Rechtmäßigkeit der Ruhensanordnung nicht entgegensteht.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.