Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9 B 22/11, 9 B 22/11 (9 C 13/11) Generato dall'IA

Land consolidation: statutory grounds for permitting revision on divergence from case law regarding interim orders

Numero d'incarto 9 B 22/11, 9 B 22/11 (9 C 13/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the appellant's complaint and permitted a revision appeal, finding that the lower court's decision deviated from established case law regarding the requirements for temporary orders in land consolidation proceedings. The dispute concerned a challenge to a provisional directive issued during a land consolidation process, specifically addressing the legal standards for such interim measures under § 36(1) Sentence 1 of the Federal Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG). By allowing the revision on grounds of legal divergence, the court effectively reversed the lower instance's procedural ruling to ensure consistent application of the doctrine governing provisional administrative orders, while the temporary fee settlement was made pursuant to the Court Costs Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Land consolidation: statutory grounds for permitting revision on divergence from case law regarding interim orders: The dispute concerned a challenge to a provisional directive issued during a land consolidation process, specifically addressing the legal standards for such interim measures under § 36(1) Sentence 1 of the Federal Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG). By allowing the revision on grounds of legal divergence, the court effectively reversed the lower instance's procedural ruling to ensure consistent application of the doctrine governing provisional administrative orders, while the temporary fee settlement was made pursuant to the Court Costs Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
raggruppamento terreni motivi di revisione decisioni incidentali presupposti legali impugnazione di decisioni amministrative fine del processo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Basis for permitting the revision appeal due to deviation from established case law.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions governing the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings and associated court costs.
Generato dall'IA
9 B 26/17
Land consolidation: specific requirements for temporary orders and the limits of judicial fact-finding in staged administrative procedures
8 B 1/22
Land consolidation provisional order: denial of continuing declaratory interest where repetition of administrative act realized
9 B 21/18
Land consolidation area delimitation requirements and interplay between annulment and obligation claims under § 8 FlurbG
8 B 3/22
Land consolidation: Admissibility of non-admission of revision and validity of lay judge allocation in simultaneous hearing days
9 B 32/14
Provisional possession order in land consolidation: classification as continuous administrative act under § 36 FlurbG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Basis for permitting the revision appeal due to deviation from established case law.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions governing the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings and associated court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Flurbereinigung; vorläufige Anordnung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO wegen Abweichung des angefochtenen Urteils von der ständigen Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts zu den Voraussetzungen einer vorläufigen Anordnung nach § 36 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FlurbG zuzulassen.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.