Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 17/11, 6 B 17/11 (6 C 30/11) Generato dall'IA

Future scope of weapons and ammunition prohibition under § 41 Abs. 2 WaffG

Numero d'incarto 6 B 17/11, 6 B 17/11 (6 C 30/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal on the ground of fundamental legal significance, allowing the appellant to challenge the lower instance's decision and setting the amount in dispute for the subsequent appeal. The case concerns the scope of a future weapons and ammunition prohibition order under German law, specifically challenging whether such a ban can be imposed to cover prospective possession. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits appeal when a question of law has not been sufficiently clarified in case law, identified here as whether a prohibition under § 41 Abs. 2 of the Weapons Act (WaffG) can be issued for future possession.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Future scope of weapons and ammunition prohibition under § 41 Abs. 2 WaffG: The case concerns the scope of a future weapons and ammunition prohibition order under German law, specifically challenging whether such a ban can be imposed to cover prospective possession. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits appeal when a question of law has not been sufficiently clarified in case law, identified here as whether a prohibition under § 41 Abs. 2 of the Weapons Act (WaffG) can be issued for future possession.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legge sulle armi impugnazione di decisioni amministrative portata della legge del contratto motivi che possono invocarsi divieto dell'abuso di diritto difesa e questioni militari

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Primary legal basis cited in the first dispositive order to grant leave to appeal based on the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
Generato dall'IA
6 C 30/11
Whether a weapon possession ban under § 41 Abs. 2 WaffG requires current possession or may prohibit future acquisition of license-requiring firearms based on personal danger.
5 StR 555/18
Illegal firearm possession: Exclusion of liability for violating a weapons ban under § 52 Abs. 3 Nr. 8 WaffG for non-entitled individuals
3 StR 18/26
Incomplete characterization of concurrent firearms offenses in the dispositive and mandatory correction of the judgment
6 C 60/14
Hunter's possession of semi-automatic rifle with magazine capacity exceeding two rounds: interpretation of the ban on jagdgesetzlich prohibited weapons under WaffG and BJagdG
4 StR 33/23
Reclassification of unauthorized firearm possession under § 51 vs. § 52 WaffG and war weapon control under KrWaffKontrG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Primary legal basis cited in the first dispositive order to grant leave to appeal based on the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; zukünftiges Waffen- und Munitionsverbot

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Beantwortung der bisher in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts nicht ausreichend geklärten Frage beitragen, ob ein Waffen- und Munitionsbesitzverbot nach § 41 Abs. 2 WaffG auch für den zukünftigen Besitz ausgesprochen werden kann.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.