Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
8 B 44/11, 8 B 44/11 (8 C 18/11) Generato dall'IA

Legitimate expectations of an administrative authority in subsidy revocation based on inter-authority administrative agreement

Numero d'incarto 8 B 44/11, 8 B 44/11 (8 C 18/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the plaintiff's appeal for review (Revisionszulassung), finding that the case possesses fundamental importance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. The dispute concerns whether a municipal authority can claim protection of legitimate expectations (Vertrauensschutz) against the revocation of an unlawful subsidy decision by a state authority, specifically where the revocation departs from an administrative practice that both authorities had previously agreed upon to ensure legal certainty. The key legal issues to be resolved on the merits include whether such an inter-authority agreement constitutes a public-law settlement contract (öffentlich-rechtlicher Vergleichsvertrag) under § 55 VwVfG and what legal consequences follow therefrom.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Legitimate expectations of an administrative authority in subsidy revocation based on inter-authority administrative agreement: 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. The dispute concerns whether a municipal authority can claim protection of legitimate expectations (Vertrauensschutz) against the revocation of an unlawful subsidy decision by a state authority, specifically where the revocation departs from an administrative practice that both authorities had previously agreed upon to ensure legal certainty. The key legal issues to be resolved on the merits include whether such an inter-authority agreement constitutes a public-law settlement contract (öffentlich-rechtlicher Vergleichsvertrag) under § 55 VwVfG and what legal consequences follow therefrom.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contratto di diritto amministrativo revoca della decisione amministrativa tutela della buona fede sovvenzione fine del processo autorità comunali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The main ground for allowing the appeal for review due to fundamental importance.
Generato dall'IA
8 B 81/09
Retroactive Revocation of Sewage Subsidies: Legitimate Expectations and Constitutional Limits on True Retroactivity
7 C 13/09
Settlement of administrative subsidy dispute and nullification of prior judgments under VwGO § 106
3 B 58/12
Revocation of public subsidy for violation of tendering duties under VOB/VOL: admissibility of circular-based "serious breach" presumption under § 49 Abs. 3 VwVfG NRW
7 C 14/09
Settlement-based discontinuance of proceedings under § 106 VwGO and voiding of prior judgments in a subsidy dispute
III ZR 234/10
Recovery of public investment subsidies for private-law breach of public procurement regulations

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The main ground for allowing the appeal for review due to fundamental importance.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; kann eine Behörde bei der Rücknahme eines rechtswidrigen Subventionsbescheides durch eine andere Behörde Vertrauensschutz geltend machen?

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von der Klägerin geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Im Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich zu klären sein, ob sich eine Behörde (Gemeinde) gegenüber der Rücknahme eines rechtswidrigen Subventionsbescheides durch eine andere Behörde (Land) dann auf Vertrauensschutz berufen darf, wenn die andere Behörde mit der Rücknahme von einer Verwaltungspraxis abweicht, auf die sich beide zuvor zur Erzielung von Rechtssicherheit geeinigt hatten. Dabei dürfte sich auch die Frage stellen, ob eine derartige Vereinbarung den Begriff des öffentlich-rechtlichen Vergleichsvertrages (vgl. § 55 VwVfG) erfüllt und welche Rechtsfolgen daraus zu ziehen wären.