Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9 B 5/11 Generato dall'IA

Classification of hunting tax on a public-law corporation as an expenditure tax under Article 105(2a) Basic Law

Numero d'incarto 9 B 5/11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted an appeal on points of law, ruling that the plaintiff's complaint against the lower court's refusal was admissible and well-founded. The dispute concerns the assessment of a hunting tax (Jagdsteuer) on a public-law corporation, specifically a hunting association, challenging its classification as a tax on expenditure. The court determined that the case possesses fundamental legal significance, necessitating appellate review to clarify whether a hunting tax can lawfully be levied on a public-law corporation as a consumption tax (Aufwandsteuer) within the meaning of Article 105(2a) of the German Basic Law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Classification of hunting tax on a public-law corporation as an expenditure tax under Article 105(2a) Basic Law: The dispute concerns the assessment of a hunting tax (Jagdsteuer) on a public-law corporation, specifically a hunting association, challenging its classification as a tax on expenditure. The court determined that the case possesses fundamental legal significance, necessitating appellate review to clarify whether a hunting tax can lawfully be levied on a public-law corporation as a consumption tax (Aufwandsteuer) within the meaning of Article 105(2a) of the German Basic Law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
imposta di consumo corporazione di diritto pubblico imposta sulle società tassazioni fiscali diritto tributario regalia della caccia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Procedural rule applied to admit the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
Generato dall'IA
9 C 10/11
Jagdsteuerpflicht of Jagdgenossenschaften for non-leased communal hunting districts and applicability of expenditure tax to public-law corporations
9 C 2/12
Municipal exclusion from hunting tax liability under Art. 105(2a) GG due to absence of personal consumption expenditure
9 C 14/16
Hunting tax liability of a nonprofit GmbH: expenditure tax inapplicable to entities exclusively pursuing economic income generation
9 B 70/11, 9 B 70/11 (9 C 2/12)
Municipal game tax as a cost tax: constitutional validity under Art. 105(2a) GG
VI B 92/11
Tax deductibility of hunting exam expenses as income-related costs requiring a demonstrable link to earning income

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Procedural rule applied to admit the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Heranziehung einer öffentlich-rechtlichen Körperschaft zur Jagdsteuer

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Rechtsfrage geben, ob von einer Jagdgenossenschaft als öffentlich-rechtlicher Körperschaft eine Jagdsteuer als Aufwandsteuer i.S.d. Art. 105 Abs. 2a GG erhoben werden darf.