Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 B 13/11, 5 B 13/11 (5 C 12/11) Generato dall'IA

Admission of revision on entitlement to foster care allowances for kinship care under §§ 27(2a), 33, 39 SGB VIII

Numero d'incarto 5 B 13/11, 5 B 13/11 (5 C 12/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) 5th Senate granted the plaintiffs' complaint and admitted a revision for the reason that the legal matter has fundamental significance. The dispute concerns educational assistance (Hilfe zur Erziehung), specifically the prerequisites for kinship care and the entitlement to foster care allowances under social law. The court ordered that the lower court’s decision, which denied these claims, is overturned to allow for a definitive ruling on whether the statutory requirements for relative caregiving and corresponding financial support are met in this specific family arrangement. The decisive legal basis consists of §§ 27(2a), 33(1), and 39 of the Eighth Social Code (SGB VIII), which govern the provision and funding of youth welfare services, including the specific conditions under which relatives may receive care allowances instead of institutional placements.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 39 SGB VIII; Admission of revision on entitlement to foster care allowances for kinship care under §§ 27(2a), 33, 39 SGB VIII: The dispute concerns educational assistance (Hilfe zur Erziehung), specifically the prerequisites for kinship care and the entitlement to foster care allowances under social law. The court ordered that the lower court’s decision, which denied these claims, is overturned to allow for a definitive ruling on whether the statutory requirements for relative caregiving and corresponding financial support are met in this specific family arrangement. The decisive legal basis consists of §§ 27(2a), 33(1), and 39 of the Eighth Social Code (SGB VIII), which govern the provision and funding of youth welfare services, including the specific conditions under which relatives may receive care allowances instead of institutional placements.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto all'assistenza sociale accoglimento in una famiglia assegni familiari parentela servizio sociale base legale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.
§ 39 SGB VIII
2a, § 33 Satz 1, § 39 SGB VIII Stellung zu nehmen.
Generato dall'IA
B 10 EG 9/15 B
Elterngeld für Pflegeeltern ohne Adoptionspflege: keine analoge Anwendung ohne Regelungslücke; Darlegungserfordernisse der Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde bei Grundsatzrüge
5 C 25/11
Reimbursement Rights for Foster Care Providers After Change of Parental Residence: Scope of SGB VIII §§ 89a(3) and 89e(1)
5 B 16/23, 5 B 16/23 (5 C 5/24)
Reimbursement of foster care costs: Interaction between youth welfare benefits and statutory adoption care
5 C 15/16
Prohibition of offsetting statutory long-term care insurance benefits against youth welfare foster care allowance under § 39 SGB VIII
5 C 25/12
Foster care cost reimbursement: analogical extension of § 89a Abs. 2 SGB VIII to pre-existing local competence and pre-benefit residence determination

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Hilfe zur Erziehung; Pflegegeld

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Kläger ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, zu den Voraussetzungen der Verwandtenpflege und der Gewährung von Pflegegeld nach den § 27 Abs. 2a, § 33 Satz 1, § 39 SGB VIII Stellung zu nehmen.