Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 55/10, 6 B 55/10 (6 C 19/11) Generato dall'IA

Examiner contact during internal control procedures: violation of equality of opportunity and proportionality of failing grade under freedom of occupation

Numero d'incarto 6 B 55/10, 6 B 55/10 (6 C 19/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) allowed the plaintiff’s revision, finding that the case possesses fundamental significance for the uniform development of law. The dispute concerned a student’s challenge to a failing grade (insufficient) imposed after the student personally contacted the examiner to request an explanation of the work's evaluation during the internal administrative control or objection procedure. The decisive legal issue identified by the court is whether such personal contact between the examinee and examiner violates the federal law principle of equality of opportunity in examination procedures to such a degree that grading the work as "insufficient" constitutes a proportionate sanction under the constitutional right to freedom of occupation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Examiner contact during internal control procedures: violation of equality of opportunity and proportionality of failing grade under freedom of occupation: The dispute concerned a student’s challenge to a failing grade (insufficient) imposed after the student personally contacted the examiner to request an explanation of the work's evaluation during the internal administrative control or objection procedure. The decisive legal issue identified by the court is whether such personal contact between the examinee and examiner violates the federal law principle of equality of opportunity in examination procedures to such a degree that grading the work as "insufficient" constitutes a proportionate sanction under the constitutional right to freedom of occupation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazione dei diritti procedurali impugnazione di decisioni amministrative sanzione amministrativa principio di parità di trattamento regolamento d'esame relazioni personali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Legal basis cited for determining the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis cited for determining the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
6 B 7/11
Legality of exam grading standards and adequacy of right-to-be-heard compliance in judicial review of professional examinations
6 C 19/11
Proportionality of automatic zero-grade sanction for attempted examiner influence in bar exam
1 WB 64/11
Validity of Staff Officer Course examination grade: procedural defects and excessive exam scope violating the principle of equality of opportunity
6 B 54/16
State examination failure: procedural error in rejecting witness evidence as unsubstantiated where equality of training opportunity is at issue
6 B 22.25
Exclusion of independently reviewable judicial control for examiner's procedural decision to disregard post-exam additions under § 44a VwGO

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Legal basis cited for determining the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis cited for determining the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Kontaktaufnahme des Prüflings mit dem Prüfer

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie wirft die klärungsbedürftige Frage auf, ob eine persönliche Kontaktaufnahme des Prüflings mit dem Prüfer im Widerspruchs- oder verwaltungsinternen Kontrollverfahren mit dem Anliegen, die Bewertung einer Arbeit durch den Prüfer erläutert zu erhalten, sich als Verletzung des bundesrechtlichen Gebots der Chancengleichheit im Prüfungsverfahren darstellt, die nach ihrem Gewicht eine Bewertung der Arbeit mit ungenügend als eine vor dem Grundrecht der Berufsfreiheit verhältnismäßige Sanktion erscheinen lässt.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.