Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 PKH 7/11, 1 PKH 7/11 (1 C 6/10) Generato dall'IA

After-the-fact legal aid denied due to lack of supporting evidence for impecuniability

Numero d'incarto 1 PKH 7/11, 1 PKH 7/11 (1 C 6/10)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) dismissed the application for subsequent legal aid and the appointment of counsel, finding the statutory prerequisites unmet. The dispute concerned a request for legal aid filed during the final oral hearing of a revision proceeding, which was subsequently concluded by a settlement. The court held that subsequent legal aid is only permissible if the applicant had filed a request and fulfilled all necessary conditions before the conclusion of the proceedings; however, the applicant failed to attach any supporting evidence to the request, in violation of § 117 Abs. 2 ZPO. The decisive legal basis relied upon was § 166 VwGO in conjunction with §§ 114 and 121 Abs. 1 ZPO, emphasizing that legal aid must enable the intended legal pursuit or defense prior to the finalization of the legal instance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 166 VwGO, § 114 Satz 1 ZPO, § 117 Abs. 2 ZPO; After-the-fact legal aid denied due to lack of supporting evidence for impecuniability: The dispute concerned a request for legal aid filed during the final oral hearing of a revision proceeding, which was subsequently concluded by a settlement. The court held that subsequent legal aid is only permissible if the applicant had filed a request and fulfilled all necessary conditions before the conclusion of the proceedings; however, the applicant failed to attach any supporting evidence to the request, in violation of § 117 Abs. 2 ZPO. The decisive legal basis relied upon was § 166 VwGO in conjunction with §§ 114 and 121 Abs. 1 ZPO, emphasizing that legal aid must enable the intended legal pursuit or defense prior to the finalization of the legal instance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura di gratuito patrocinio udienza dibattimentale mancanza di prova domanda di revisione nomina del difensore fine del processo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 166 VwGO
Die Voraussetzungen für die Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und die Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts sind nicht gegeben (§ 166 VwGO i.V.m.
§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO
Durch Prozesskostenhilfe soll der bedürftigen Partei die "beabsichtigte" Rechtsverfolgung oder Rechtsverteidigung ermöglicht werden (§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO).
§ 117 Abs. 2 ZPO
Vorliegend hat die Klägerin ihren Prozesskostenhilfeantrag zwar in der mündlichen Verhandlung vor Abschluss des das Revisionsverfahren beendenden Vergleichs gestellt, diesem aber entgegen § 117 Abs. 2 ZPO keinerlei Belege beigefügt.
Generato dall'IA
6 PKH 10/13, 6 PKH 10/13 (6 B 61/13)
Denial of legal aid for hearing complaint due to lack of sufficient prospects of success
8 PKH 8/11, 8 PKH 8/11 (8 B 81/11)
Legal aid denial where appeal fails to establish violation of principle of conviction or divergence in evidence valuation
1 BvR 362/10
Retroactive legal aid denial: lack of substantiated factual and legal argumentation rendering the application non-decidable at the time the instance concluded
III ZA 9/25
Legal aid application failure due to missing current financial evidence and inability to prove unblamable delay in obtaining documents
8 PKH 1/19, 8 PKH 1/19 (8 B 10/19)
Denial of legal aid for revision due to insufficient substantiation of grounds for admission under occupational rehabilitation compensation law

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nachträgliche Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe

[GRUENDE]

Die Voraussetzungen für die Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und die Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts sind nicht gegeben (§ 166 VwGO i.V.m. §§ 114, 121 Abs. 1 ZPO). Durch Prozesskostenhilfe soll der bedürftigen Partei die "beabsichtigte" Rechtsverfolgung oder Rechtsverteidigung ermöglicht werden (§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO). Nach der Beendigung eines Rechtszugs ist eine nachträgliche Bewilligung daher nur möglich, wenn der Antragsteller vor Abschluss des Verfahrens einen Prozesskostenhilfeantrag gestellt und alles zur Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe Erforderliche getan hat (Beschluss vom 1. Juli 1991 - BVerwG 5 B 26.91 - Buchholz 310 § 166 VwGO Nr. 23). Vorliegend hat die Klägerin ihren Prozesskostenhilfeantrag zwar in der mündlichen Verhandlung vor Abschluss des das Revisionsverfahren beendenden Vergleichs gestellt, diesem aber entgegen § 117 Abs. 2 ZPO keinerlei Belege beigefügt.