Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
3 B 71/10, 3 B 71/10 (3 C 8/11) Generato dall'IA

Jurisdiction of official supervisory organization to revoke mandate of appointed test engineer under vehicle licensing rules

Numero d'incarto 3 B 71/10, 3 B 71/10 (3 C 8/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, allowing the plaintiff to proceed to revision on the grounds of fundamental significance, thereby overturning the lower court's rejection of the appeal complaint. The dispute concerns the vehicle licensing regime, specifically whether an officially recognized supervisory organization (AC) under Annex VIIIb of the German Road Traffic Licensing Regulation (StVZO) has the jurisdiction to revoke the mandate of a test engineer it itself appointed, or whether such a revocation requires the consent of the licensing and supervisory authority. The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision when a legal question of fundamental significance requires clarification by the supreme administrative court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Jurisdiction of official supervisory organization to revoke mandate of appointed test engineer under vehicle licensing rules: The dispute concerns the vehicle licensing regime, specifically whether an officially recognized supervisory organization (AC) under Annex VIIIb of the German Road Traffic Licensing Regulation (StVZO) has the jurisdiction to revoke the mandate of a test engineer it itself appointed, or whether such a revocation requires the consent of the licensing and supervisory authority. The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision when a legal question of fundamental significance requires clarification by the supreme administrative court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
vigilanza dell'autorità competente revoca della decisione amministrativa autorità con potere di nomina autorizzazione provvisoria motivi di revisione inosservanza delle norme sulla competenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the jurisdiction of the supervisory organization.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in determining the court fees and costs for the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the proceedings on revision.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in calculating the provisional amount in dispute.
Generato dall'IA
3 B 52/16, 3 B 52/16 (3 C 19/17)
Legal effect of revoking licensing authority approval on subsequent supervisory organization’s withdrawal of inspection engineer appointment
3 C 19/17
Mandatory revocation of sovereign test engineer mandate for untrustworthiness despite prior warning
3 C 8/11
Revocation of inspection engineer appointment: agency competence and absence of state approval requirement under StVZO
3 AV 4/16
Jurisdiction for provisional public transport permits: exclusion of locally bound rights under § 52 No. 1 VwGO
3 B 16/14
Insufficient specification of medical fitness examination scope in driving license revocation proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the jurisdiction of the supervisory organization.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the proceedings on revision.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in calculating the provisional amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in determining the court fees and costs for the amount in dispute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zulassung von Fahrzeugen; Widerruf der Betrauung eines Prüfingenieurs; Zuständigkeit einer amtlich anerkannten Überwachungsorganisation; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg; die Sache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob eine amtlich anerkannte Überwachungsorganisation im Sinne der Anlage VIII b zu § 29 StVZO für den Widerruf der Betrauung eines von ihr betrauten Prüfingenieurs zuständig ist und ob sie hierfür gegebenenfalls der Zustimmung der Anerkennungs- und Aufsichtsbehörde bedarf.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.