Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 45/10, 6 B 45/10 (6 C 2/11) Generato dall'IA

Broadcasting Fee: Exemption of Non-Exclusively Private Reception Devices as Secondary Devices Under § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV

Numero d'incarto 6 B 45/10, 6 B 45/10 (6 C 2/11)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, thereby allowing the petitioner to proceed to the next instance and prevailing in this procedural stage. The case involves a dispute regarding the liability for broadcasting fees, specifically challenging whether novel broadcasting reception devices located in a non-exclusively private area but assigned to a property where the taxpayer maintains other private devices constitute exempt "secondary devices." The court found the matter to be of fundamental legal significance, as it requires clarification on the application of the secondary device exemption under § 5(3) of the Broadcasting Fee Statute (RGebStV) to such mixed-use premises, with the admission of revision based on § 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Broadcasting Fee: Exemption of Non-Exclusively Private Reception Devices as Secondary Devices Under § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV: The case involves a dispute regarding the liability for broadcasting fees, specifically challenging whether novel broadcasting reception devices located in a non-exclusively private area but assigned to a property where the taxpayer maintains other private devices constitute exempt "secondary devices." The court found the matter to be of fundamental legal significance, as it requires clarification on the application of the secondary device exemption under § 5(3) of the Broadcasting Fee Statute (RGebStV) to such mixed-use premises, with the admission of revision based on § 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
canone radiotelevisivo diritto all'antenna proprietà privata spese legali vertenza non amministrativa diritto dei mezzi di comunicazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Serves as the main ground for admitting the appeal on revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal dispute.
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
Generato dall'IA
6 C 45/10
Exemption of internet-enabled computers from broadcasting fees as secondary devices under mixed private and commercial use on the same property
6 B 44/10
Fee exemption for secondary radio and television receivers in non-exclusive private areas
6 C 15/10
Exemption of internet-enabled PCs as secondary broadcasting devices: interpretation of § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV requiring co-location on the same property rather than in the non-private area.
6 B 36/10, 6 B 36/10 (6 C 45/10)
Exemption of business-use internet-capable computer from broadcasting fee as a second device in shared domestic premises
6 C 7/09
Broadcasting fee exemption for mobile radio units in vehicles used exclusively for transport by facilities for disabled persons under § 5 Abs. 7 RGebStV

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Serves as the main ground for admitting the appeal on revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal dispute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde; Rundfunkgebühr

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung des Rechtsstreits zuzulassen. Das angestrebte Revisionsverfahren kann zur Beantwortung der bisher in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts nicht ausreichend geklärten Frage beitragen, ob neuartige Rundfunkempfangsgeräte, die sich im nicht ausschließlich privaten Bereich befinden, aber einem Grundstück zugeordnet sind, auf dem der Gebührenpflichtige im privaten Bereich andere Rundfunkempfangsgeräte zum Empfang bereit hält, gemäß § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV als Zweitgeräte von der Rundfunkgebühr befreit sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.