Scope of "personal" services exclusion in German civil servant health benefits when treatment is performed by an employee of a relative's practice
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, thereby permitting the applicant's revision against the lower court's judgment. The dispute concerns a claim for state financial assistance (Beihilfe) for medical treatment, specifically challenging whether the statutory exclusion provision applies when the beneficiary was treated by an employee of a close relative's practice rather than by the relative personally. The central legal issue is the interpretation of § 5 Abs. 4 Nr. 6 Satz 1 BhV, which excludes financial assistance for "personal" services provided by a close relative, and whether this exclusion extends to treatment rendered by an employee within that relative's establishment.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Scope of "personal" services exclusion in German civil servant health benefits when treatment is performed by an employee of a relative's practice: The dispute concerns a claim for state financial assistance (Beihilfe) for medical treatment, specifically challenging whether the statutory exclusion provision applies when the beneficiary was treated by an employee of a close relative's practice rather than by the relative personally. The central legal issue is the interpretation of § 5 Abs. 4 Nr. 6 Satz 1 BhV, which excludes financial assistance for "personal" services provided by a close relative, and whether this exclusion extends to treatment rendered by an employee within that relative's establishment.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IABasis for granting leave to appeal (Zulassung der Revision) due to the need for clarification of a significant legal question.
Testo completo
Tätigkeit eines Angehörigen bei Heilbehandlung; Ausschluss des Beihilfeanspruchs
[GRUENDE]
Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Die angestrebte Entscheidung erscheint geeignet, zur Klärung der Frage beizutragen, ob eine "persönliche" Tätigkeit eines nahen Angehörigen bei einer Heilbehandlung, die nach § 5 Abs. 4 Nr. 6 Satz 1 BhV zum Ausschluss des Beihilfeanspruchs führt, auch dann gegeben ist, wenn der Beihilfeberechtigte nicht von seinem nahen Angehörigen eigenhändig selbst, sondern lediglich im Betrieb des nahen Angehörigen von einem Angestellten behandelt worden ist.