Constitutionally compliant application of § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG deportation ban: standards for judicial fact-finding in cases of general dangers
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Administrative Court granted the complainant's appeal and permitted the appeal to the full court (Revision), thereby allowing the case to proceed for a final determination on the merits. The dispute concerned a challenge to a deportation ban under § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG, specifically involving the doctrine of "allgemeine Gefahren" (general dangers) and its constitutionally compliant application in judicial fact-finding. The court ruled that the appeal must be admitted due to the fundamental legal significance of the matter, citing § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, to clarify the standards required for judicial conviction formation when applying deportation protection provisions in a manner consistent with the constitution.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Constitutionally compliant application of § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG deportation ban: standards for judicial fact-finding in cases of general dangers: The dispute concerned a challenge to a deportation ban under § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG, specifically involving the doctrine of "allgemeine Gefahren" (general dangers) and its constitutionally compliant application in judicial fact-finding. The court ruled that the appeal must be admitted due to the fundamental legal significance of the matter, citing § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, to clarify the standards required for judicial conviction formation when applying deportation protection provisions in a manner consistent with the constitution.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IALegal basis for admitting the revision (appeal to the full court) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Testo completo
Abschiebungsverbot bei allgemeinen Gefahren; verfassungskonforme Anwendung; richterliche Überzeugungsbildung; Revisionszulassung
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet.
Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage geben, welche Anforderungen an die richterliche Überzeugungsbildung in Fällen verfassungskonformer Anwendung von § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 1 und 3 AufenthG zu stellen sind.