Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 B 9/10, 1 B 9/10 (1 C 13/10) Generato dall'IA

Admission of revision for interpretation of "supporting terrorism" in Regelausweisung under § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG and applicability of criminal law doctrine

Numero d'incarto 1 B 9/10, 1 B 9/10 (1 C 13/10)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the admission of the defendant's revision appeal, finding the appeal admissible and well-founded. The dispute concerned a regular expulsion order based on the defendant's membership in an organization that supports terrorism, with the key legal issue being the interpretation of the phrase "supports terrorism" within the context of expulsion grounds. The Court held that the case is of fundamental importance for the clarification of the legal concept under § 54 No. 5 of the Residence Act (AufenthG) and specifically whether the interpretation of this civil/administrative law concept may draw upon criminal law jurisprudence regarding §§ 129 and 129a of the Criminal Code (StGB).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG; Admission of revision for interpretation of "supporting terrorism" in Regelausweisung under § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG and applicability of criminal law doctrine: The dispute concerned a regular expulsion order based on the defendant's membership in an organization that supports terrorism, with the key legal issue being the interpretation of the phrase "supports terrorism" within the context of expulsion grounds. The Court held that the case is of fundamental importance for the clarification of the legal concept under § 54 No. 5 of the Residence Act (AufenthG) and specifically whether the interpretation of this civil/administrative law concept may draw upon criminal law jurisprudence regarding §§ 129 and 129a of the Criminal Code (StGB).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione della sentenza penale espulsione giudiziaria dottrina giuridica interpretazione del diritto terrorismo revisione in materia d'asilo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited in the operative order as the basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.
§ 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG
Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Auslegung von § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG geben, insbesondere zum Merkmal einer Vereinigung, die "den Terrorismus unterstützt", und inwieweit hierzu auf die strafrechtliche Rechtsprechung zu §§ 129, 129a StGB zurückgegriffen werden kann.
Generato dall'IA
1 B 58/16, 1 B 58/16 (1 C 18/16)
Admissibility of Revision: Interpreting Interplay Between §§ 26a and 27a AsylG
1 B 4/13
Befristung der Sperrwirkung einer Ausweisung: Voraussetzungen der Abweichung vom Ausreise-Erfordernis bei Asylberechtigten
1 B 70/17, 1 B 70/17, 1 PKH 41/17
Revisionszulassung in Asylsachen: Unzulässigkeit der Grundsatzrüge bei abweichender Tatsachenwürdigung ohne klärungsbedürftige Rechtsfrage
3 StR 189/24
Concurrence of laws for membership in a terrorist association: aggregation of acts into a single factual-legal unit and limits on re-prosecution of subsequent participation
1 B 19/11, 1 B 19/11, 1 PKH 11/11
Expulsion for supporting a terrorist association: scope of "support" under § 54 No. 5 AufenthG and interplay with freedom of expression

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited in the operative order as the basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Regelausweisung; Vereinigung, die den Terrorismus unterstützt; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Auslegung von § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG geben, insbesondere zum Merkmal einer Vereinigung, die "den Terrorismus unterstützt", und inwieweit hierzu auf die strafrechtliche Rechtsprechung zu §§ 129, 129a StGB zurückgegriffen werden kann.