Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
7 B 26/09, 7 B 26/09 (7 C 1/10) Generato dall'IA

Temporal transition of Environmental Legal Remedies Act exclusion rules and compatibility with EU Community law

Numero d'incarto 7 B 26/09, 7 B 26/09 (7 C 1/10)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) allowed the admission of the appeal on points of law, granting the plaintiffs' complaint against the lower court's refusal to admit revision and setting the amount in dispute for both the complaint and revision proceedings. The dispute centers on the compatibility of the German Environmental Legal Remedies Act (UmwRBehG) with EU Community law, specifically challenging whether § 5 UmwRBehG can exclude the application of § 4 UmwRBehG for administrative proceedings initiated before June 25, 2005, even when the final administrative decision was issued after that date. The decisive legal basis involves the requirement for fundamental legal significance under § 132(2)(1) VwGO to resolve the question of whether the temporal transition rules of § 5 UmwRBehG are compatible with higher-ranking Community law obligations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Temporal transition of Environmental Legal Remedies Act exclusion rules and compatibility with EU Community law: The dispute centers on the compatibility of the German Environmental Legal Remedies Act (UmwRBehG) with EU Community law, specifically challenging whether § 5 UmwRBehG can exclude the application of § 4 UmwRBehG for administrative proceedings initiated before June 25, 2005, even when the final administrative decision was issued after that date. The decisive legal basis involves the requirement for fundamental legal significance under § 132(2)(1) VwGO to resolve the question of whether the temporal transition rules of § 5 UmwRBehG are compatible with higher-ranking Community law obligations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto delle obbligazioni norme di procedura norme di compatibilità legge di armonizzazione procedura di revisione procedura di cooperazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Serves as the procedural basis for granting the complaint against the refusal to admit revision, as the case has fundamental significance.
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15)
Compatibility of statutory exclusion of environmental objections with EU law
7 B 15/10
Immission control pre-approval: EU compatibility of objection preclusion for environmental associations and qualified electronic signature requirement
10 B 3/23
Klagebegründungsfrist in Umweltrecht: Präklusion bei verspätetem Tatsachen- und Beweismittelvortrag
7 B 19/14, 7 B 19/14 (7 C 17/15)
Compatibility of the Saarland exclusion of objections in administrative proceedings with EU law
4 B 21/19
Emission tolerability in BauGB § 34 vs. § 35 contexts and the same-provision requirement for Divergenz complaints

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Serves as the procedural basis for granting the complaint against the refusal to admit revision, as the case has fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Umwelt-Rechtsbehelfsgesetz; Vereinbarkeit mit Gemeinschaftsrecht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Kläger gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie wirft insbesondere die klärungsbedürftige Frage auf, ob § 5 UmwRBehG mit Gemeinschaftsrecht vereinbar ist, soweit er die Anwendbarkeit von § 4 UmwRBehG für Verwaltungsverfahren, die bis zum 25. Juni 2005 eingeleitet worden sind, auch dann ausschließt, wenn eine behördliche Entscheidung erst nach diesem Tag ergangen ist.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.