Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 23.25, 2 B 23.25 (2 C 19.25) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2025:161225B2B23.25.0 Generato dall'IA

Duty of public employer to empirically monitor teachers' actual working hours to prevent civil service weekly working time exceedances

Numero d'incarto 2 B 23.25, 2 B 23.25 (2 C 19.25)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's appeal, lifting the lower court's refusal to allow appeal and permitting a revision in the principal case, while setting the provisional disputed value at €31,435.59 and deferring cost decisions to the main proceedings. The case involves a civil service dispute where the central legal issue is whether a public employer is obligated to conduct empirical investigations into the actual working hours of teachers to prevent excesses in the weekly working hours owed by civil servants. The decision rests on the requirement of fundamental significance under Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act, allowing the Federal Administrative Court to clarify this question, with the provisional value determination based on the Courts' Constitution Act and the Administrative Court Fees Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG; Duty of public employer to empirically monitor teachers' actual working hours to prevent civil service weekly working time exceedances: The case involves a civil service dispute where the central legal issue is whether a public employer is obligated to conduct empirical investigations into the actual working hours of teachers to prevent excesses in the weekly working hours owed by civil servants. The decision rests on the requirement of fundamental significance under Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act, allowing the Federal Administrative Court to clarify this question, with the provisional value determination based on the Courts' Constitution Act and the Administrative Court Fees Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lavoro straordinario durata legale del lavoro doveri del funzionario funzione pubblica inchiesta amministrativa tasse amministrative

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Primary legal basis cited in the dispositive for lifting the lower court's refusal and permitting the revision due to the matter's fundamental significance.
§ 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions cited in the dispositive to justify the provisional determination of the value of the subject matter for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 64/13, 2 B 64/13 (2 C 42/13)
Revision admissibility for state civil service law and normative requirement for statutory regulation of teachers’ working hours
5 AZR 986/08
Teacher's claim for excess hours pay based on invalid abolition of age-related teaching duty reduction and lack of works council participation.
2 B 5/13
Involuntary part-time employment for civil servant teachers: constitutional invalidity and discretionary scope for restoring full-time status after BVerfG decision
2 B 67/13, 2 B 67/13 (2 C 45/13)
Admissibility of Revision for financial compensation of teacher preemptive hours under State civil service law
2 B 61/13, 2 B 61/13 (2 C 41/13)
Revisibility of state school law and normative fixity of teachers’ weekly mandatory teaching hours for financial compensation of uncompensated advance teaching

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Primary legal basis cited in the dispositive for lifting the lower court's refusal and permitting the revision due to the matter's fundamental significance.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions cited in the dispositive to justify the provisional determination of the value of the subject matter for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Die Entscheidung des Niedersächsischen Oberverwaltungsgerichts über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil vom 11. Februar 2025 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstands wird für das Revisionsverfahren vorläufig auf 31 435,59 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des beklagten Landes ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Verfahren kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage bieten, ob der Dienstherr empirische Untersuchungen zum tatsächlichen Umfang der von Lehrern erbrachten Arbeitszeit anstellen muss, um eine Überschreitung der von Beamten geschuldeten Wochenarbeitszeit zu vermeiden.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Werts des Streitgegenstands für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.