Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 B 18/24, 4 B 18/24 (4 C 1/25) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2025:100425B4B18.24.0 Generato dall'IA

Building permits and scope of the Environmental Rights Directive: admissibility of third-party annulment actions

Numero d'incarto 4 B 18/24, 4 B 18/24 (4 C 1/25)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the leave-to-appeal complaint filed by the intervenor, revoking the lower court's refusal to admit the revision and referring the case for substantive review, while leaving cost and final dispute value determinations to the final decision. The dispute concerns a third-party challenge to building permits and whether such administrative acts fall within the scope of the Environmental Rights Directive (UmwRG) and the specific enforcement provisions thereunder. The court admitted the appeal on the grounds of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the revision is expected to clarify the extent to which building permits are subject to § 1 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 5 UmwRG and, consequently, whether third-party annulment actions are governed by § 6 UmwRG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Building permits and scope of the Environmental Rights Directive: admissibility of third-party annulment actions: The dispute concerns a third-party challenge to building permits and whether such administrative acts fall within the scope of the Environmental Rights Directive (UmwRG) and the specific enforcement provisions thereunder. The court admitted the appeal on the grounds of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the revision is expected to clarify the extent to which building permits are subject to § 1 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 5 UmwRG and, consequently, whether third-party annulment actions are governed by § 6 UmwRG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ricorso per annullamento nel diritto dell'Unione licenza edilizia direttiva decisione d'esecuzione motivi di revisione diritti costituzionali specifici

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the dispute value (Streitwert) in the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
7 C 24/16
Waste incineration license: curability of omitted environmental impact assessment under § 4 Abs. 1b UmwRG and remand after partial annulment
9 B 7/22
Admissibility of revision against road planning approval: scope of environmental access to justice statute and strict ten-week briefing deadline
4 B 37/10
Building permit for wind energy: material consequence of choosing between § 10 and § 19 BImSchG procedures and the impact of a defective UVPG pre-screening on the validity of the approval
7 B 23/18
Permissibility of declaring environmental permit unlawful and unenforceable instead of annulling it to allow cure of missing Habitats Directive compatibility assessment
4 B 11/16
Admissibility of civil litigation against building permits under § 74 VwGO and the effect of state law abolishing the preliminary objection procedure on statutory limitations

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the dispute value (Streitwert) in the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung;

Baugenehmigungen und Drittanfechtungsklagen

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen vom 12. Juni 2024 wird aufgehoben. Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Kostenentscheidung bleibt der Schlussentscheidung vorbehalten.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstandes wird für das Revisionsverfahren vorläufig auf 15 000 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beigeladenen ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, inwieweit Baugenehmigungen dem Anwendungsbereich des § 1 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 5 UmwRG und Drittanfechtungsklagen in der Folge § 6 UmwRG unterfallen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.