Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 31/22, 2 B 31/22 (2 C 16/23) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2023:310723B2B31.22.0 Generato dall'IA

Disqualification of pensions in disciplinary proceedings delayed beyond reasonable time: Union law and ECHR constraints

Numero d'incarto 2 B 31/22, 2 B 31/22 (2 C 16/23)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) overturned the lower court's refusal to grant leave for revision and admitted the appeal, ruling in favor of the defendant in this procedural dispute concerning a public servant's disciplinary proceedings. The core issue is whether the removal of pension rights can be imposed as a disciplinary sanction when the disciplinary procedure suffered from excessive delay, and what constraints the EU law and the European Convention on Human Rights impose on such sanctions in this context. The decisive legal basis is the requirement of fundamental legal significance under § 69 BDG in conjunction with § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which necessitates clarification of these specific legal questions to justify the admission of the revision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 69 BDG i. V. m. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Disqualification of pensions in disciplinary proceedings delayed beyond reasonable time: Union law and ECHR constraints: The core issue is whether the removal of pension rights can be imposed as a disciplinary sanction when the disciplinary procedure suffered from excessive delay, and what constraints the EU law and the European Convention on Human Rights impose on such sanctions in this context. The decisive legal basis is the requirement of fundamental legal significance under § 69 BDG in conjunction with § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which necessitates clarification of these specific legal questions to justify the admission of the revision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto alla rendita diritto disciplinare diritti procedurali convenzione europea dei diritti dell'uomo diritti costituzionali specifici allontanamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.
§ 69 BDG i. V. m. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the case.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 62/09
Withdrawal of civil servant pension: inapplicability of ECHR Article 6 to disciplinary proceedings and cure of administrative evidentiary defects by judicial fact-finding
1 BvR 1/23
Social law pension benefits: Constitutional unfitness of complaint for failure to request procedural extension against "surprise" judicial hint
2 B 123/11
Disciplinary dismissal notwithstanding excessive procedural delay: loss of trust irreparable and ECHR time limits not overriding domestic material law
2 B 30/21
Disziplinarrecht: Effect of undue procedural delay on the maximum sanction of dismissal from public service
2 C 16/23
Retroactive pension forfeiture for retired civil servants: exclusion of disabled representatives' hearing rights and irrelevance of procedural delay to sanction severity

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 69 BDG i. V. m. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the case.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; überlange Dauer des beamtenrechtlichen Disziplinarverfahrens

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des Niedersächsischen Oberverwaltungsgerichts vom 25. April 2022 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde des Beklagten ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung i. S. v. § 69 BDG i. V. m. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage bieten, ob auch im Fall der überlangen Dauer des beamtenrechtlichen Disziplinarverfahrens auf die Aberkennung des Ruhegehalts erkannt werden kann und welche Vorgaben hierzu sich aus dem Unionsrecht oder der Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 22. Oktober 2010 (BGBl. II S. 1198) ergeben.