Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
IX B 26/16 Generato dall'IA

Complaint against tax court suspension of enforcement inadmissible without express permission from lower court

Numero d'incarto IX B 26/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Fiscal Court dismissed the applicant’s complaint as inadmissible, ruling that the applicant did not prevail and must bear the costs of the appellate proceedings. The dispute concerned the admissibility of a complaint against a lower tax court’s order suspending the enforcement of a tax assessment. The lower court had issued the suspension order without expressly permitting a complaint to the appellate court. The decisive legal basis was § 128 Abs. 3 FGO, which establishes that a complaint against a lower tax court’s decision on the suspension of enforcement is only admissible if the lower court itself explicitly permits it in its order or in a subsequent decision. The court held that this statutory requirement cannot be bypassed by the appellate court, and that such a permit is mandatory even when the complaint alleges a procedural error, thereby preventing the appellate court from admitting its own jurisdiction.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 135 Abs. 2 FGO; Complaint against tax court suspension of enforcement inadmissible without express permission from lower court: The dispute concerned the admissibility of a complaint against a lower tax court’s order suspending the enforcement of a tax assessment. The lower court had issued the suspension order without expressly permitting a complaint to the appellate court. The decisive legal basis was § 128 Abs. 3 FGO, which establishes that a complaint against a lower tax court’s decision on the suspension of enforcement is only admissible if the lower court itself explicitly permits it in its order or in a subsequent decision. The court held that this statutory requirement cannot be bypassed by the appellate court, and that such a permit is mandatory even when the complaint alleges a procedural error, thereby preventing the appellate court from admitting its own jurisdiction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione della tassazione fiscale decisioni incidentali esecuzione della sentenza base legale sospensione della riscossione fiscale base imponibile

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 135 Abs. 2 FGO
Basis for the order that the applicant bears the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III B 81/14
Revocation of tax court complaint withdrawal and inadmissibility of appeal against suspension of enforcement refusal
IV S 11/10
Inadmissibility of repeated motion for suspension of tax assessment enforcement based on subsequent favorable lower court judgment
IX B 112/22
Unlawful referral of tax proceedings to administrative court: Inadmissibility of appeal absent express permission in the initial decision
III B 151/11
Inadmissibility of complaint challenging lower court’s failure to apply binding effect of prior administrative practice
I B 207/09
Inadmissibility of regular action challenging suspension of enforcement despite defective legal remedy instruction

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 135 Abs. 2 FGO

Basis for the order that the applicant bears the costs of the complaint proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zulassung der Beschwerde gegen eine Entscheidung des FG über die Aussetzung der Vollziehung (AdV) nur durch das FG

[LEITSATZ]

NV: Auch bei der Rüge eines Verfahrensfehlers kann nur das FG, nicht der BFH, die Beschwerde gegen einen AdV-Beschluss zulassen .

[TENOR]

Die Beschwerde des Antragstellers gegen den Beschluss des Sächsischen Finanzgerichts vom 21. April 2015 4 V 890/14 wird als unzulässig verworfen.

Die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens hat der Antragsteller zu tragen.

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist unzulässig und daher durch Beschluss zu verwerfen.

Gegen eine Entscheidung des Finanzgerichts (FG) über die Aussetzung der Vollziehung (AdV) ist eine Beschwerde nach § 128 Abs. 1 der Finanzgerichtsordnung (FGO) grundsätzlich nicht statthaft. Denn einem Beteiligten steht nach § 128 Abs. 3 FGO gegen eine Entscheidung des FG über eine AdV gemäß § 69 Abs. 3 FGO die Beschwerde zum Bundesfinanzhof nur dann zu, wenn sie entweder in der Entscheidung selbst oder in einem späteren Beschluss vom FG zugelassen worden ist. Dies gilt auch für einen Beschluss nach § 69 Abs. 6 FGO. Hier ist aber die Beschwerde vom FG nicht zugelassen worden.

Eine Zulassung der Beschwerde durch den Bundesfinanzhof (BFH) ist nicht möglich. Dies gilt auch dann, wenn mit der Beschwerde die Verletzung eines Verfahrensfehlers gerügt wird (vgl. BFH-Beschluss vom 17. Mai 1994 I B 234/93, BFH/NV 1995, 47; Gräber/Ratschow, Finanzgerichtsordnung, 8. Aufl., § 128 Rz 14).

Die Kostenentscheidung beruht auf § 135 Abs. 2 FGO.