Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
X B 183/12 Generato dall'IA

Admissibility of time series comparison as a method for estimating tax bases

Numero d'incarto X B 183/12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Court of Finance (BFH) granted leave to appeal the taxpayer's revision, finding that the legal question presented is of fundamental significance and requires clarification by the highest court, while issuing the remainder of the decision without further justification. The dispute concerns tax assessment methodology, specifically whether the "time series comparison" constitutes a suitable method for estimating tax bases. The decisive legal basis is § 115 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 of the Fiscal Courts Act (FGO), which permits the admission of a revision where a question of law is of fundamental importance, paired with § 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 FGO regarding the simplification of the order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 115 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 FGO, § 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 FGO; Admissibility of time series comparison as a method for estimating tax bases: The dispute concerns tax assessment methodology, specifically whether the "time series comparison" constitutes a suitable method for estimating tax bases. The decisive legal basis is § 115 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 of the Fiscal Courts Act (FGO), which permits the admission of a revision where a question of law is of fundamental importance, paired with § 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 FGO regarding the simplification of the order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto tributario tassazioni fiscali tassazione d'ufficio metodologia giuridica base di computo concorrenza fiscale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 115 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 FGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
§ 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 FGO
Procedural rule applied to issue the remainder of the decision without a full written reasoning.
Generato dall'IA
X R 19/14
Limiting revenue estimation via time-series comparison for formally proper records; equivalence of goods purchase and consumption; incorrect trade class selection
X B 12/14
Lack of Decision-Relevance for Time-Series Estimation Method and Non-Binding Nature of Judicial Examiner’s Proposal in Tax Estimation Disputes
X R 20/13
Tax estimation requirements for time-series comparison of cash register data and formal bookkeeping defects
IV R 2/18
Judicial review of tax estimation based on limited contemporaneous evidence: insufficient justification for extrapolating single-day revenue data over multi-year periods and unexplained use of maximum gross profit margins
X R 19/21
Statistical validity of official rate collections and priority of internal over external business comparison in tax estimation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 115 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 FGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

§ 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 FGO

Procedural rule applied to issue the remainder of the decision without a full written reasoning.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Eignung des Zeitreihenvergleichs als Schätzungsmethode

[LEITSATZ]

NV: Die Rechtsfrage, ob und ggf. unter welchen Voraussetzungen oder Einschränkungen der sogenannte "Zeitreihenvergleich" eine geeignete Methode zur Schätzung der Besteuerungsgrundlagen darstellt, bedarf der höchstrichterlichen Klärung.

[GRUENDE]

1. Die Revision wird nach § 115 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 der Finanzgerichtsordnung (FGO) wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zugelassen. Die Rechtsfrage, ob und ggf. unter welchen Voraussetzungen oder Einschränkungen der sog. "Zeitreihenvergleich" eine geeignete Methode zur Schätzung der Besteuerungsgrundlagen darstellt, bedarf der höchstrichterlichen Klärung.

2. Im Übrigen ergeht der Beschluss gemäß § 116 Abs. 5 Satz 2 letzte Alternative FGO ohne Begründung.