Generic recusal motion against unnamed judges rejected for lack of specific justification

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint and rejected the motion for recusal of unspecified judges, with the decision being unappealable. The applicant filed a motion for recusal directed generically against "the senates of the Federal Constitutional Court" without providing a comprehensible justification, while also lodging a constitutional complaint. The Court determined the recusal motion was manifestly inadmissible because it failed to name specific judges and lacked a substantial basis, resulting in no judge being excluded from the proceedings and no need for official statements from them. The legal basis for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint relied on § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the Court to omit further reasoning when the merits are not taken up.