Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 130/24 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2024:rk20240305.2bvr013024 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint in criminal matter rejected for failure to meet substantiation requirements under §§ 23, 92 BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 130/24
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany declined to admit the constitutional complaint to the merits, ruling it manifestly inadmissible without needing to address the accompanying request for reinstatement of the previous period. The case involved a criminal matter where the complainant attempted to challenge a lower court’s decision. The court held that the submission failed to meet the mandatory requirements for reasoned substantiation under § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 and § 92 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), as the arguments lacked sufficient specific legal reasoning and factual detail required for admissibility.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint in criminal matter rejected for failure to meet substantiation requirements under §§ 23, 92 BVerfGG: The case involved a criminal matter where the complainant attempted to challenge a lower court’s decision. The court held that the submission failed to meet the mandatory requirements for reasoned substantiation under § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 and § 92 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), as the arguments lacked sufficient specific legal reasoning and factual detail required for admissibility.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali denuncia penale esame nel merito allegazione motivata mancanza di prova costituzionalità delle leggi
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 628/23
Constitutional complaint rejected for insufficient substantiation: failure to apply established fundamental rights standards to specific facts
2 BvR 2230/21
Insufficiently reasoned constitutional complaint: failure to substantiate violation of constitutional rights under §§ 23 Abs. 1 S. 2, 92 BVerfGG
1 BvR 1472/11
Constitutional complaint rejected for lack of sufficient substantiation
1 BvR 963/16
Constitutional complaint rejected for failure to substantiate fundamental rights violation
2 BvR 2211/22
Constitutional Complaint Rejected for Lack of Substantiation and Warning of Misuse Fee

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1, § 92 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for declaring the constitutional complaint manifestly inadmissible due to failure to meet substantiation requirements.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahme einer offensichtlich unzulässigen Verfassungsbeschwerde in einer Strafsache - Verfehlung der Begründungs- und Substantiierungsanforderungen - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, ohne dass es auf den Antrag auf Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand ankommt. Sie genügt den Darlegungs- und Substantiierungserfordernissen der § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1, § 92 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz offensichtlich nicht.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.