Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 1851/22 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2023:rk20230817.2bvr185122 Generato dall'IA

Vollstreckungsgericht violates debtor’s constitutional rights to be heard and informational self-determination when altering sworn statement under § 261 Abs 1 BGB

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1851/22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court partially granted the constitutional complaints, setting aside the regional court's enforcement order and referring the matter back for retrial, while extending the temporary suspension of enforcement until the appellate court re-decides; the dispute concerned a debt enforcement proceeding where the lower court applied § 261(1) BGB to alter a debtor's sworn statement, allegedly violating the debtors' fundamental rights. The Court found that the enforcement court violated the claim to be heard (Article 103(1) Basic Law) for one debtor and the right to informational self-determination and general personality rights (Article 2(1) in conjunction with Article 1(1) Basic Law) for the other, mandating that the enforcement court must adequately consider fundamental rights constraints when interpreting and applying the statute regarding changes to sworn statements.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 261 Abs 1 BGB; Vollstreckungsgericht violates debtor’s constitutional rights to be heard and informational self-determination when altering sworn statement under § 261 Abs 1 BGB: The Court found that the enforcement court violated the claim to be heard (Article 103(1) Basic Law) for one debtor and the right to informational self-determination and general personality rights (Article 2(1) in conjunction with Article 1(1) Basic Law) for the other, mandating that the enforcement court must adequately consider fundamental rights constraints when interpreting and applying the statute regarding changes to sworn statements.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
credito in esecuzione diritto di essere sentito diritti fondamentali oggetto della lite diritto all'autodeterminazione informativa autorizzazione all’esecuzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 261 Abs 1 BGB
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 2821/14
Right to be heard violation in enforcement counterclaim regarding admissibility of contesting enforcement costs and interest
1 BvR 1314/23
Breach of right to be heard in civil procedure through unaddressed party argument on creditor’s duty to mitigate damages regarding collection costs
XI ZR 199/22
Violation of the right to be heard due to judicial oversight of plaintiff’s modified claims in consumer loan repayment dispute
2 BvR 977/16
Constitutional right to oral hearing under Art. 103 GG violated by written judgment without prior notice despite request to avoid decision on the file
2 BvR 1013/11
Constitutional violation of right to be heard for ignoring decisive factual submissions and evidence offers in practice liquidation suit

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Artikel 103 Absatz 1 in Verbindung mit Artikel 19 Absatz 3 des Grundgesetzes

Constitutional basis cited in the operative order for finding a violation of the right to be heard, leading to the reversal of the lower court's decision.

Artikel 2 Absatz 1 in Verbindung mit Artikel 1 Absatz 1 des Grundgesetzes

Constitutional basis cited in the operative order for finding a violation of the general right of personality, leading to the reversal of the lower court's decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Teilweise stattgebender Kammerbeschluss: Zur Berücksichtigung grundrechtlicher Belange des Vollstreckungsschuldners durch das Vollstreckungsgericht im Rahmen der Auslegung und Anwendung des § 261 Abs 1 BGB (Änderung einer eidesstattlichen Versicherung) - hier: Verletzung des allgemeinen Persönlichkeitsrechts sowie des Gehörsanspruchs im Rahmen des Vollstreckungsverfahrens über einen Auskunftsanspruch

[TENOR]

1. Der Beschluss des Landgerichts München I vom 25. August 2022 - 16 T 10239/22 - verletzt die Beschwerdeführerin zu 1. in ihrem Anspruch auf rechtliches Gehör aus Artikel 103 Absatz 1 in Verbindung mit Artikel 19 Absatz 3 des Grundgesetzes und den Beschwerdeführer zu 2. in seinem Grundrecht aus Artikel 2 Absatz 1 in Verbindung mit Artikel 1 Absatz 1 des Grundgesetzes. Der Beschluss wird daher aufgehoben. Die Sache wird an das Landgericht München I zurückverwiesen.

2. Im Übrigen wird die Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

3. Die einstweilige Aussetzung der Zwangsvollstreckung aus dem Schlussurteil des Landgerichts Düsseldorf vom 27. Januar 2020 - 5 O 390/16 - wird bis zu einer erneuten Entscheidung des Landgerichts München I über die sofortige Beschwerde der Beschwerdeführerin zu 1. verlängert.

4. Der Freistaat Bayern hat den Beschwerdeführern ihre notwendigen Auslagen im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren zu erstatten.